Title
Minutes of the Special and Regular Meetings Held on April 21, 2026 and the Special Meeting Held on April 29, 2026. (City Clerk)
Body
UNAPPROVED
Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting
Tuesday- -April 21, 2026- -5:30 p.m.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:31 p.m.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Boller, Jensen, Pryor and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5.
Absent: None.
The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(26- ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); Case Name: City of Alameda v. Greenway Golf Associates, Inc.; Court: Alameda County Superior Court; Case No: 22CV011964.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced staff provided information and Council provided direction by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:31 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
****************************************************************************************************
Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday- -April 21, 2026- -7:00 p.m.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Councilmember Daysog led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Boller, Daysog, Jensen, Pryor, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5.
Absent: None.
Agenda Changes
(26- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the Radium item [paragraph no. 26- ] be heard first.
Vice Mayor Pryor moved approval of the Mayor’s recommended agenda change.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Councilmember Boller moved approval of the City Manager agreement [paragraph no. 26- ] matter being continued to May 5, 2026, for closed and open session.
Councilmember Boller stated new and important information is being prepared by the recruiter; Council should consider the information in a future Closed Session; the approach does not reflect on the proposed candidate in any way; the candidate is impressive and has broad experience; expressed support for Council performing its fiduciary responsibility in discussing the information set forth in a future Closed Session.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Councilmember Daysog inquired about the Little League Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) [paragraph no. 26- ], to which Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded the matter would be addressed next.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is confused by the statements made by Councilmember Boller; noted that she will not support a motion she does not understand.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Daysog, Boller, Jensen, and Pryor - 4. Noes: Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 1.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated if there are young children in attendance, she would like the Little League MOU heard first or second on the Regular Agenda with the same Council speaking time limits of a Regular Agenda Item; she agreed to include the matter on the Consent Calendar with the understanding that robust public outreach had been conducted; she is concerned since residents continue to submit correspondence; she conducted a walk-through with residents; the interactions with residents means not enough public outreach has been conducted.
Vice Mayor Pryor moved approval of the Mayor’s recommendation.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements
(26- ) Bradley Strawser and Lisa Strutz, Compass Ethics, presented the Leader in Ethical Culture Award to the Police Chief.
The Police Chief made brief comments.
(26- ) Alexandra Schultheis, Motor Vehicle Board, presented the Zero Emission Vehicles Readiness Award to the Sustainability and Resilience Manager.
The Sustainability and Resilience Manager made brief comments.
Oral Communications, Non-Agenda
(26- ) Chris Ellsworth, Alameda, discussed street gutters along Buena Vista Avenue needing repair and cleaning; urged the City to properly maintain gutters and reduce flooding.
(26- ) Rachel Campos de Ivanov, West End Arts District, stated April is arts culture and creativity month; announced an upcoming program: Ocean Photographer of the Year.
(26- ) Karin Kirschbaum, Alameda, discussed oversight relative to Village of Love reports; expressed concern over the lack of records; stated reporting was conducted verbally via Zoom.
(26- ) Jennifer Radakovich, Rhythmix Cultural Works, discussed a community impact award; announced a partnership with the City for the Summer Rhythmix in the Park series starting in June.
Consent Calendar
Under Agenda Changes, the City Manager contract was continued to May 5, 2026 and the Little League MOU was moved to be considered as a Regular Agenda Item.
Councilmember Boller recused himself from the rent ordinance [paragraph no. 26- ].
Councilmember Daysog recused himself from the Webster Street Business Improvement Area assessment [paragraph no. 26- ].
The City Clerk announced the Public Hearing addressing an Economic Development subsidy [paragraph no. 26- ].
Councilmember Jensen inquired about recusals; stated that she has relationships with people on the Webster and Park Street BIA boards and also knows members of the Oakland Roots & Soul; inquired whether guidance could be provided for her potential need to recuse herself on the matters.
The City Attorney responded personal relationships and friendships alone are generally not sufficient to require recusal; stated typically, there are financial reasons for recusal; provided examples of campaign contributions in excess of $500 from a single source; noted outside the context of State law, Councilmembers need to assess whether or not they are able to remain impartial in their judgement and review of matters.
Councilmember Jensen stated that her husband is on the Board of the Chamber of Commerce and used to be on the Webster Street Business Association (WABA) board; the relationship is not sufficient for recusal; she supports economic development and could be biased towards that approach in Alameda.
The City Attorney stated personal relationships alone do not generally require recusal under State law; each Councilmember should evaluate their ability to remain impartial.
Councilmember Daysog stated his recusal is due to his home’s location and proximity to Webster Street.
The City Attorney stated State law does require Councilmembers announce the reason for recusal when prompted.
Councilmember Boller stated that his recusal is due to having investments which possibly relate to buildings in Alameda that are occupied by tenants.
Vice Mayor Pryor moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*26- ) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on March 17, 2026, and the Special City Council Meeting Held on March 24, 2026. Approved.
(*26- ) Ratified bills in the amount of $5,846,945.27.
(26- ) Recommendation to Approve Agreement Appointing Girard “Gerry” Beaudin as City Manager Effective June 30, 2026; and
(26- A) Adoption of Resolution Modifying the Council Appointee Salary Schedule Increasing the Salary Range of the City Manager Position by 1%. Continued to May 5, 2026. Continued to May 5, 2026.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a Three-Year Agreement with SHI International Corp. for Microsoft 365 Government Community Cloud Subscription Licensing Services for an Annual Cost of $343,911 and a Total Three-Year in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $1,031,734. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a One-Year Agreement with SHI International Corp. for CrowdStrike Services in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $83,803. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to the Agreement with SpenCon Construction for Repairs of Sidewalks, Curbs, and Gutters to Increase the Not-to-Exceed Amount by $1,200,000 for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $5,755,650. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Accept the Annual Military Equipment Report for the Alameda Police Department and Continue to Allow the Department to Use and Maintain the Equipment Previously Adopted. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute a Five-Year Gas Service Operations and Maintenance Agreement for Alameda Point with Pacific Gas and Electric Company in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $550,000, with up to Three One-Year Options to Renew, for a Total Not-to-Exceed $880,000 over Eight Years, Substantially in the Form of the Attached Agreement. Accepted.
(26- ) Recommendation to Approve the Webster Street Business Improvement Area Annual Assessment Report. Accepted; and
(26- A) Resolution No. 16384, “Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Webster Street Business Improvement Area of the City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 2026-27 and to Set a Public Hearing for May 5, 2026.” Adopted.
Since Councilmember Daysog recused himself, the resolution was adopted by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember Daysog - 1.]
(*26- ) Recommendation to Approve the Park Street Business Improvement Area Annual Assessment Report. Accepted; and
(*26- A) Resolution No. 16385, “Intention to Levy an Annual Assessment on the Park Street Business Improvement Area of the City of Alameda for Fiscal Year 2026-27, and to Set a Public Hearing for May 5, 2026.” Adopted.
(26- ) Ordinance No. 3398, “Amending Alameda Municipal Code Article XV (Rent Control, Limitations on Evictions and Relocation Payments to Certain Displaced Tenants) to Incorporate Policy Changes and Clarifying Updates.” Finally passed.
Since Councilmember Boller recused himself, the ordinance was adopted by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember Boller - 1.]
(*26- ) Public Hearing to Consider an Economic Development Subsidy to be Provided to the Oakland Roots & Soul; and
(*26- A) Resolution No. 16386, “Authorizing the Interim City Manager to Execute a Transient Occupancy Tax Sharing Agreement with the Oakland Roots & Soul in an Amount Not-To-Exceed $150,000 in Support of a World Cup Team at its Alameda Facility during the World Cup Tournament in Summer, 2026.” Adopted.
Continued Agenda Items
None.
Regular Agenda Items
(26- ) Recommendation to Approve a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City and Alameda Little League Baseball for Exclusive Use Permit of Littlejohn Baseball Field from March to June 2026 and August to November 2026.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the matter involves two positive programs and should not be divisive; Council will find a way to move forward.
The Recreation and Park Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Daysog stated Section 2.ii of the memo delineates set time periods and broad bands of time when baseball has priority and exclusive use of the field; outlined the proposed schedule; inquired whether staff has given consideration to creating a schedule which delineates the precise time at which a specific team is allocated practice time instead of the proposed broad times.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded staff has not published a schedule for team times; stated Little League typically occupies all of the time; there is not often a time where fields are not being used for practice or games; staff has struggled to find fields in Alameda for games; staff recently received a request for more alternate fields and locations for rain delay make-up games; staff can post the usage on the fences to update the community.
Councilmember Daysog stated a member of the public raised concerns over people being shooed off of playing fields during a reserved time for baseball with no team present; inquired whether staff has experienced the situation described.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded he has not seen the instance personally; stated concerns have been raised over staff members or volunteers performing work on the field during the day; at least two volunteer interactions with the public have occurred and been addressed; the field is open during the day for all to use outside of the reserved hours; the public is also allowed to use the field when it is not being used for baseball; if baseball members arrive during a reserved time with permits present, members of the public are asked to leave.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether there is a physical need for the fences and whether kids are able to hit beyond the fence.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the negative; stated kids in the age group do not hit beyond the fence; the fence is intended to be a barrier to prevent people from walking into active games; expressed concern over people walking into an in-progress game from adjacent sidewalks.
In response to Vice Mayor Pryor’s inquiry about the parking plan effectiveness and design, the Recreation and Parks Director presented a slide displaying the plan; stated there is a drop off zone by the Recreation Center; a parking section was closed due to vandalism attempts; staff secured 35 parking spaces through a license agreement.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether the current parking approach is working and whether families are complying.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the plan was rocky in the beginning; stated that he spent a weekend on-site to provide information to baseball families; the current status is much more compliant; multiple communications have been sent to Little League families as well as City staff being on-site; there is a lot of parent and child turnover between games, which creates an influx of traffic.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired why the matter never went before the Recreation and Parks Commission (RPC).
The Recreation and Parks Director responded initially, he would have brought the matter to RPC; stated Little League was already utilizing the field six day per week so he did not originally think the matter was a big change.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the matter being placed on a Recreation and Parks Commission agenda.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated that he wants to conduct a community meeting as well as taking the matter to the Recreation and Parks Commission to provide more opportunity for feedback.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the matter being heard by the Recreation and Parks Commission; stated Americans with Disabilities (ADA) accommodations and updates have been made to the dugouts; inquired who performed the work.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded all work was performed by City licensed contractors using City funds; stated the City will receive a reimbursement from Little League.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the field at Littlejohn Park could be reserved for a birthday on the weekend, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded the field is currently suspended from reservations; stated staff does not want to actively attract more people to the field in order to limit congestion; use is first come first served.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft further inquired whether staff considered other parks or fields which would not have precluded other uses, such as Estuary, Franklin, Krusi, Leydecker, Lincoln, and McKinley Parks; stated that she sees Littlejohn Park as a place that precludes different uses; questioned why another location could not have been used which would not have had as big an impact.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded part of the issue is that many parks are already being used by Little League; stated Little League currently uses Bayport, Rittler, Leydecker, Franklin, Tillman, Woodstock, Littlejohn, Godfried, Estuary, lower Washington, and Krusi Parks; McKinley does not have a large enough field to support Little League games.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that Littlejohn Park has been used for many years as a baseball Park for younger players; inquired whether older age groups could have a place which does not preclude weekend use during the summer months.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded staff has worked on scheduling with Little League while balancing out soccer and other Alameda youth groups that share play surfaces; stated another baseball diamond would have been needed at Rittler Park to accommodate the use needs; space for soccer use would have been lost; Bayport Park would have required the same approach; temporary fencing at Tillman Park would have precluded soccer, rugby, and other sports; each field requires some level of modification and does not allow a trade of one for the other.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry about the multipurpose gym, the Recreation and Parks Director stated the location is next to the Alameda Point gym; the space is large, flexible and able to be used for soccer; the baseball field is too large for Little League and is meant for older people; having kids play on a larger field is dangerous.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated concerns have been raised over the lack of insurance and indemnification; noted there are insurance requirements; requested clarification about where requirements can be found.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated each year, the City operates with an approved field allocation policy; anyone who rents a field or facility from the City must have insurance and indemnify the City; the requirements were established in conjunction with the City Attorney’s Office and Risk Management; each year, insurance certificates must be re-issued for use of facilities.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for extra communication and information being included in staff reports.
Stated that she is a neighbor and did not receive notice; discussed previous community meetings indicating the proposed approach would be a trial period until May 2026; expressed concerns over Little League controlling the park and a lack of neighborhood input: Debra Arbuckle, Alameda.
Stated that she lives in the neighborhood and encourages the use of Littlejohn Park to its fullest extent; expressed support for the responsiveness to concerns and needs; expressed concern over problems being repeated as new families and staff rotate in and over the outfield fencing: Heather Little, Alameda.
Urged Council postpone approval; stated that she would like to understand what will happen in the future; expressed concerns over feeling intimidated at the first community meeting; stated that she was not initially provided contact information for the Little League: Jill Ingram, Alameda.
Stated that he is part of an all-volunteer, international, organization; the division includes children of young ages; a field was removed; another field is too costly; Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) fields are being used weekly; discussed costs, investments, and donations from the League: Ron Matthews, Alameda Little League (ALL).
Stated that he lives across from Littlejohn Park; his kids play minor league and he manages a team; he is generally supportive of the League usage of the park; noise levels have been reasonable; parking has been sufficient for the neighborhood; there is congestion during drop-off windows; urged the City to manage and balance park uses: Chris Ellsworth, Alameda.
Stated that he lives near Littlejohn Park and walks his dog in the park daily; the fence changes the character of the Park; expressed support for removing the fence any time there is not an active Little League use and for the matter being heard by the Recreation and Parks Commission; stated the outreach was insufficient: Eric Embry, Alameda.
Stated there is precedence for the arrangement; residents are not revolting against the Leagues’ presence and have accepted the League as part of life; the sudden change can be difficult for neighbors; the park has been a baseball field and is not for bounce houses; baseball fields have fences; the field footprint consists of 40% of the park: Wally Beaver, ALL.
Stated the neighborhood does not have issues with supporting baseball; expressed concerns over communication and pushing out general use; stated the park is not exclusively a baseball field; there is an assumption of a right to use the park by Little League; expressed concern over ALL website messaging: Alison Greene, Alameda.
Stated that she has a child in Little League; she has volunteered to inform other members about parking for baseball events; the City has raised field usage fees; expressed support for everyone finding an equal ground; expressed concern over recent school renovations causing unfavorable results for Little League: Elaine Mendes, ALL.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does not think there is a Councilmember who is against Little League; youth sports are extremely important; the City has some work to do.
Councilmember Daysog stated speakers discussed economics relative to Wood School; inquired whether a lower fee for Wood School field use would change the current status.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the fees mentioned are set and charged by AUSD; stated the City’s field use fees are $11 per hour.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the clarification provided; stated the confusion between City and AUSD happens often; the two entities are separate; the City does not set AUSD fees.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he has heard volunteers shooing people away at Littlejohn Park; expressed support for proper signage being installed to delineate when the baseball fields are to be used expressly for baseball purposes; inquired whether staff has considered placing large signage that clearly displays dates and time periods when the field will be in use by Little League; questioned the communication strategy to keep the public informed about baseball field use.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded staff is open to installing signage; stated staff has often put up Quick Response (QR) codes for people to scan and understand when a court or field is reserved; staff can provide the same thing for Littlejohn Park.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for having the fence removed; stated that she would like to have the fence removed at the end of the day on Saturday if a make-up game is not scheduled for Sunday.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated the recommendation to remove the fence is recently; staff can work out removal details as soon as possible.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether staff has contemplated pylons instead of a fence to delineate the baseball field from the rest of the park; stated that he understands the fence is present only to separate the field from the rest of the park.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded that staff has not explored the use of pylons; stated the fence is to prevent the general public from walking into a space not knowing that a ball could hit them; the temporary fencing is used often in multiple locations for the safety of the general public.
In response to Councilmember Daysog’s further inquiry related to signage, the Recreation and Parks Director stated that he would prefer the fence; stated young children often cannot and run around; the fence is a way to protect everyone.
Councilmember Boller inquired whether the fence can be removed for periods of time to help alleviate the perception of limited access.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded staff is happy to support removal of the fence for periods of time; stated the amount of effort to remove the fence between each game has been discussed.
Councilmember Boller inquired whether there has been consideration for City staff or volunteers to monitor and facilitate interactions between the public and Little League.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated that he has discussed the parking issues with people on-site; he spent time directing people to the proper locations and directly providing information; ALL has attempted to place signage; the Park Monitor has been requested to monitor the parking on weekends; it would be difficult to have a permanent staff member on-site; he holds weekly meetings with ALL to discuss any operational issues; staff is making every effort possible to create a smooth program.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for post-event follow-up; stated it would be helpful to have assistance in real-time.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether a 40-foot gap exists in the fencing to allow people access between baseball games.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated between the third and first baseline of the outfield there is a 30 to 40 foot gap where people can walk through; people often bring dogs to use the field; activity on the field exists at regular times; a physical field barrier or gate does not prevent entering the field.
Vice Mayor Pryor questioned whether plastic barriers similar to those at Rittler Park could be used; stated that she does not understand why the fence is an issue if access remains.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated the outfield temporary fence is roughly 3 to 4 feet tall.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for the City’s Park system; discussed the Ala Costa recreation group use of the Littlejohn Community Center; stated that she understands the group’s use of the field during the week is being limited; requested clarification about the status.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated Ala Costa is not being prohibited from using the field during the week; members were present at the community workshops and discussed concerns; Ala Costa was primarily focused on the hardscape areas adjacent to the Community Center and playground; concerns have been raised surrounding drop-off and pick-up; the temporary loading zone has allowed a loading space.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern over trash being left in the planting beds alongside the building; inquired whether facilitation of the cleanup is incumbent upon Little League.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated Recreation and Parks staff still services the park regularly in the event proper cleanup does not occur; trash buildup should not be an issue over an extended period of time.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the issue has been negatively impacted by a lack of transparency; inquired whether there is something the City can do, such as a change in the Municipal Code, to specify who is able to use parks during designated times; questioned whether the changes can be made at a staff level; expressed support for the matter being heard by the Recreation and Parks Commission, which should explore other fields that do not foreclose public use; stated there is value of both the Little League program and having a neighborhood park; expressed support for the fence changes, which should be as expansive as possible; stated that she would to direct staff to have the Recreation and Parks Commission explore other options; the Commission meetings are noticed and public to address transparency concerns.
The City Attorney stated that he recommends Council provide staff the opportunity to work together and gather responsive information to Council concerns regarding direction for park space allocations; expressed support for Council concerns being adequately addressed; stated that he and staff have clearly heard Council’s desire for a closer look.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the approach is yes, and; she wants both the Little League and access for the public; expressed concern over having one wonderful use supplant another wonderful use.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether the completion of construction at Rittler Park would impact the space available for Little League.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded there will not be additional space; stated a portion of the park has been provided for school space; the park is now smaller.
***
(26- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she needs two additional minutes of speaking time.
Councilmember Boller moved approval of allowing two additional minutes of speaking time for Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
***
***
(26- ) Councilmember Daysog moved approval of allowing two additional minutes for all Councilmembers.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Boller, Daysog, Jensen, and Pryor - 4. Noes: Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 1.
***
Councilmember Daysog inquired the standard distance from home plate to standard outfield fences for the 10 to 12 baseball age group.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the amount of space needed is approximately 200 feet from home plate; stated the temporary fencing is set at 200 feet.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether staff has considered fencing that is not complete, allowing for gaps between at center field; stated part of the issue is that residents north of Buena Vista Avenue and Benton Street face a fence during the weekends.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded staff has concerns regarding safety.
Councilmember Daysog expressed concern over the public access to the park and the length of the fence; stated having the fence removed Monday through most of Friday is progress; the presence of the fence creates a visual and physical barrier which indicates a baseball field is the only use for the space; he is not convinced a good enough case has been made to have had the fence installed or that there is a need to continue having it present; the ball is not typically hit far enough to hit the fence; the point of a fence is to delineate public space from the baseball field; expressed support for more time being spent on alternatives, such as pylons, in an effort to have Littlejohn Park continue to read as a neighborhood park for the public; expressed support for baseball and Little League getting small children energized in sports; stated the space is also a public neighborhood facility; City should not lose track of the circumstance and try for accommodation; ample testimony has been provided indicating members of the public have been shooed away and scared off, resulting in Littlejohn Park becoming a baseball field as opposed to a public park; expressed support for better public noticing to ensure an understanding of availability for any park use as a community asset.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the fences have been installed as a safety measure; requested input be provided by the City Attorney on the levels of risk and insurance involved.
The City Attorney stated staff works collaboratively with on-the-ground experience; staff has indicated there is risk of people sustaining injuries as a result of being hit by a ball without the fence; his Office defers to staff’s recommendation; the last thing staff wants is for someone to get hurt or sustain a serious injury.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether baseball season will continue for another six weeks, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated fall ball is from August 1st to November 1st.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the current Council discussion would impact the upcoming season, to which the Recreation and Parks Director responded the MOU indicates the active dates as March 15th through the end of May, then from August 1st to November 1st.
Councilmember Jensen expressed support for clarifying the dates.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated Council may direct staff to find an alternative option before August.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support for the questions and points raised regarding safety and risk management; stated that 10 to 12 year-olds do not generally hit the ball at a rate which would reach the fence resulting in some sort of injury; a ground ball will likely not roll far enough to hit the fence; the arguments of safety need to be balanced with the age group in mind.
Vice Mayor Pryor stated the bigger challenge consists of people walking aimlessly into an active game, not necessarily how strong children are while at-bat; people are often guilty of walking while on their phone and not paying attention to where they are going.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether there are any risk management standards relative to insurance for sports fields that establishes whether or not fencing is required.
The City Attorney responded in the negative; stated the Joint Powers Authority (JPA) is fairly uniform and allows the governing agency to make the ultimate decision on how to operate the City.
In response to Councilmember Boller’s inquiry about the Council direction, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she wants to have the Recreation and Parks Commission involved, as well as City staff, including the City Attorney and City Manager’s Offices.
Councilmember Boller moved approval of providing Council direction to have the matter heard at the Recreation and Park Commission before returning to Council.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the motion be amended to include involvement from the City Manager and City Attorney.
Councilmember Boller agreed to amend the motion.
Vice Mayor Pryor seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the motion be amended to include that the matter return to Council before August.
Councilmember Daysog requested the motion be repeated.
The City Clerk stated the motion is to approve Council direction for the matter being heard at the Recreation and Parks Commission with involvement from the City Attorney and City Manager’s office, returning to Council before the August season with alternatives.
The City Attorney inquired whether Councilmember Boller’s motion includes adopting the current, or any, proposed version of the MOU, to which Councilmember Boller responded in the negative.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether Council is adopting the MOU, to which Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft responded in the negative.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the action would result in immediate termination of the baseball program.
The City Attorney responded in the negative; stated unless Council directs such action, the current motion is silent and the program would proceed; the City Manager will have discretion on how to balance competing uses on the field consistent with Council direction.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the matter is being directed to return to Council prior to the beginning of the August baseball season; stated that she would also still like the fence removal dates to be provided.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Boller, Daysog, Pryor and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Abstention: Councilmember Jensen - 1.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 8:52 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:05 p.m.
***
(26- ) Summary Title: Approval of Project Agreements with Radium Presents for the Radium Performing Arts Center Consisting of the Development of an Approximately 53,000 Square Foot Performing Arts Center and Approximately 1-Acre Plaza on 1.87-Acres of City-Owned Land Referred to as Site A Blocks 12 and 13 at Alameda Point, Including Adoption of a Site-Specific Surplus Land Exemption
Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 16387, “Declaring 1.87 Acres of City-Owned Land Between Building 77 and the Seaplane Lagoon Promenade to be Exempt Surplus Land under the Surplus Land Act.” Adopted; and
(26- A) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Lease Option for Three Years with Three One-Year Extensions in Furtherance of a Sixty-Six Year Ground Lease with Purchase Option with Radium Presents for Approximately 1.87 Acres of Land Located at Alameda Point, and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement Consistent with the Purchase Option. Introduced.
***
(26- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated staff needs 15 minutes for the presentation.
Councilmember Jensen moved approval of allowing 15 minutes for the presentation.
Vice Mayor Pryor seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
***
The Community Development Manager gave a Power Point presentation and Chris Seiwald, Radium Presents, made brief comments.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether staff has considered the instruments which will memorialize public access to the lobby and balcony viewing areas; stated the vantage point will provide a breathtaking view of the San Francisco Bay.
The Community Development Manager responded the intention is that the view areas would be open to the public whenever the facility is open and accessible without a ticket to the performance; the access term would run with the land through a restrictive covenant being established; members of the public are free to come off the street and enjoy the space whenever the facility is open.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support for the access covenant running with the land.
Councilmember Jensen requested clarification for the associated Surplus Lands Act (SLA) requirements; stated that she understands the requirements establish that lands must become available for housing or other uses.
The Community Development Manager stated Alameda has an exemption under the SLA, which is unique to Alameda Point; the exemption was crafted by Assemblymember Bonta and has certain criteria that must be met; the City can use the specific exemption for properties located at Alameda Point.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the site is not good for housing and is exempt from SLA.
The Community Development Manager responded the site has long been identified for mixed use in both the Site A Development Plan and the Precise Plan; stated the site has not been contemplated for housing and has always been considered to be used as something catalytic as a draw to area.
Urged Council to approve the proposal; stated that he cannot think of many things which would have such a dramatically positive impact at Alameda Point as Radium; the proposal is catalytic and beneficial; expressed support for the associated team: Joe Ernst, Ernst Development Partners.
Discussed how the project affects the surrounding area; stated the project is one of the bigger pieces to build Alameda Point into a multi-modal neighborhood; discussed transit changes; expressed concern over the City requiring parking spaces for the length of the lease; recommended the City edit the lease to include parking, a bus-rapid transit or rail stop within a quarter mile; state both options provide greater access to the theatre than parking: Mitch Ball, Alameda.
Stated that he loves living in Alameda; Alameda has a great arts community but can do even more; many kids travel to other cities for art performances; Alameda does not have many places that can support the level of arts provided; the program will be transformational; urged Council support: Nathan Lasche, Radium.
Stated arts programming at Alameda Point has value; announced an upcoming event in its sixth year at Radium; expressed support for the proposal; stated embracing of the arts is higher than ever before; urged Council support: Xuanlan Nguyen and Jamie Martinez, Maya Lin Parent Teacher Association.
Expressed support for the matter; stated that her organization has been in Alameda for almost two decades and began when not many arts programs were available; there has been incredible expansion and growth throughout Alameda due in part to support from the City; Radium will be a good partner to all arts organizations in Alameda: Jennifer Radakovich, Rythmix Cultural Works.
Stated the project is an important catalyst at Alameda Point; Alameda Point has great momentum with housing development, food and beverage, recreation, and research and development uses; arts and culture are the heart of the area and help create a multi-layered community; urged Council to support the project: Laura Billings, srmErnst Development Partners.
Expressed support for the project; provided statistics regarding arts related revenue; discussed health and well-being benefits of arts programs; stated the social impacts are profound; more arts and a venue of the size is a great thing for Alameda: Katie Connell, Alameda Arts Alliance.
Expressed support for Radium; stated the program is about economic vitality; the project transforms underutilized space at Alameda Point into a destination that will attract visitors, increase foot traffic, and generate revenue; the investment is not only cultural but also economic; urged Council to approve the project: Madlen Saddik, Chamber of Commerce.
Councilmember Jensen stated the matter is exciting; she is the wife and mother of performing artists; she appreciates the performing arts; she has spent many hours enjoying Radium programs and events; the lease will be a tremendous asset to Alameda Point; there is a need for arts in Alameda; discussed a violin performance at the Library and a Fleetwood Macrame event at the Alameda Theatre; stated Alameda and neighboring residents are looking for arts activities; Alameda has an opportunity to use this site.
Vice Mayor Pryor expressed support for the matter; stated that she can picture the building and public access walkway along the water with view corridors; she is excited for the future art in Alameda; residents will become spoiled with being close to art.
Councilmember Boller stated that he is in awe of the community; everyone has come together to support the project; noted that his mother was a proponent for community arts at previous Council meetings; stated that she lived in Alameda for most of her life and worked towards making things happen in the arts community; discussed a leadership award from the County Board of Supervisors; stated it is important to make opportunities related to this program happen; representatives from arts groups are present; the impacts of arts are important for children as well as Mastick Senior Center users; the City has an amazing opportunity to develop approximately one-third of its landmass; changing one-third of a town changes the entire town; years prior, the arts had not been as represented as they are presently; quoted hit mothers website: “In all this time, I remain humble to the realization that art is about the process of creation more than the finished product;” stated the City is currently in the process of creation and the City has the amazing ability to coalesce around the project and provide support.
Councilmember Daysog stated the decision represents an important, positive, inflection point in supporting arts and culture for Alameda; the City still has many more points and milestones to go; it is important to support the matter and give people a fighting chance to ensure the success of arts and culture; discussed benefitting from arts in music with Alameda Youth Symphony; stated approving this matter is a good place to start; expressed support for the vantage point of the building for views of San Francisco and surrounding areas; stated the City is memorializing the vantage point as a permanent part of Alameda Point to enjoy views, arts, and cultural performances.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the staff report is detailed and comprehensive; there is desire to have the project succeed by setting milestones; expressed support for Christopher Seiwald and his work championing the arts; stated residents make Alameda what it is in welcoming all to the Island; she is in awe of everyone’s talents and has seen cultural performances for school aged children; discussed Children’s Theatre live performances; stated that she is excited about the potential this project brings.
Councilmember Boller moved approval of the staff recommendation [including adoption of the resolution and introduction of the ordinance].
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the Interim City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Ruby’s Place, Inc. dba Restorative Pathways in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $1,511,000 to Operate the Day Center and Safe Parking Program for the term May 1, 2026, through June 30, 2027, with the Option of a One-Year Extension, for a Total Two-Year Amount Not-to Exceed $3,022,000.
The Housing and Human Services Manager gave a presentation.
Councilmember Jensen moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Boller seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Vice Mayor Pryor expressed support for staff providing thorough vetting results; stated that she appreciates the information in the report and is glad the City can provide support to residents.
On the call for the questions, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(26- ) Recommendation to Approve Sale of City-Owned Property Located at 650 West Ranger Avenue (Building 92) at Alameda Point to Ernst Development Partners, Inc. and Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Purchase and Sale Agreement and Related Documents;
(26- A) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 16388, “Declaring Approximately 3.56 Acres of City-Owned Property at Alameda Point Located at 650 West Ranger Avenue to Be Exempt Surplus Land under the Surplus Land Act.” Adopted; and
(26- B) Introduction of Ordinance Approving a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Sale of City-Owned Property Located at 650 West Ranger Avenue (Building 92) to Ernst Development Partners, Inc., and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Related Documents. Introduced.
The Base Reuse Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
In response to Councilmember Jensen’s inquiry related to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Attorney stated the City can never predict whether people will choose to commence litigation; staff has worked hard on CEQA review for the property sale; after taking possession of the property, the buyer will be able to present a project, which is when CEQA review will occur; public improvements are proposed as part of the project and are consistent with the Master Infrastructure Plan (MIP).
Councilmember Jensen expressed support for the project.
Expressed support for the project; urged Council approval: Christopher Seiwald, Radium Presents.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the project proposal is great and comes from someone the City has worked with for years; noted that she has seen proposals from the developer from her time on the Planning Board.
Vice Mayor Pryor moved approval of the staff recommendation [including adoption of the resolution and introduction of the ordinance].
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(26- ) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Article XVIII (Tobacco Retailers) of Chapter VI (Businesses, Occupations, and Industries) Prohibiting the Sale and Distribution of Nitrous Oxide by Tobacco Retailers, Convenience Stores, and Other Retail Establishments. Introduced.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director gave a Power Point presentation.
In response to Councilmember Daysog’s inquiry related to legality, the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director stated there are legal constraints to selling nitrous oxide products; there are age restrictions; retailers are required to check identification regardless of age and report purchases to the State; none of the requirements occurred when she purchased items; in part, retailers may not be aware of requirements since it is not included in a City ordinance; the ordinance would provide better education to retailers.
Councilmember Daysog inquired how many of the retailers sell nitrous oxide.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded the City has 42 retailers; stated that she visited three; two of the three sold nitrous oxide products and one did not.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director could legally purchase the products based on her age, to which the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a youth decoy was used, to which the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded in the negative; stated that she spoke with her kids and learned that the products are called whippits and galaxy gas.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director stated that she was able to purchase the products; she should have been asked to produce identification; the sale of nitrous oxide should also be reported to the State; neither action occurred.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether use of nitrous oxide is becoming a growing trend among high school kids.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded in the affirmative; stated there is also a trend for adult use; the ban has been passed by other California cities; the Center for Disease Control and other agencies report significant increases in car crashes and emergency room visits resulting from effects of nitrous oxide use; the marketing is similar to flavored tobacco and is appealing to youths.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted there is also an increase in use reported from the United Kingdom.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she understands State law requires retailers to advise customers of the dangers of nitrous oxide; inquired whether the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director was so advised, to which the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded in the negative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the requirement is part of State law or a two-year Bill.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded current State regulations require purchases to be age restricted above 18 years as well as reporting the sale of the product; stated the State law has been in place since 2012.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired the difference between the State law and the new legislation.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded the new legislation bans the sale of nitrous oxide; stated the old legislation allows the sale with certain parameters.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the ban would include sales by tobacco retailers as well as convenience stores.
Councilmember Jensen stated State law requires that sales be age restricted as well as having retailers advising customers that the product must be used in a medical setting and associated dangers with use; noted the requirements are not being followed; inquired the cost for the nitrous oxide product.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded one product cost $30 and the other was $2; stated that she did not purchase cartridges due to products being sold out; individual cartridges cost a few dollars and bulk cartridges average $40 to $50.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the products are being sold in cannabis establishments, to which the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded in the negative.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the proposed ordinance would prohibit use of nitrous oxide in Alameda, only the sale, to which the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded the ordinance would prohibit the sale and distribution of nitrous oxide.
Councilmember Jensen inquired what would happen to the ordinance if the State bills passes after adoption.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded the approach is similar to flavored tobacco ordinance; stated the City ordinance follows State laws.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the ordinance conflicts with State law, to which the Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded in the negative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the ordinance is identical to State law.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director responded in the negative; stated the State law could be amended; currently, two State laws are proposed; one bans nitrous oxide outright and the other bans over eight ounces.
Councilmember Jensen stated the Stopwaste Board took a position on nitrous oxide cannisters which have negative impacts on the environment and inability to be disposed of in places other than landfill.
Vice Mayor Pryor stated the small cannisters are targeted to look like party favors; the products are marketed to young people similar to flavored tobacco.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director stated the products are typically brightly colored; use has become prolific and instances of people misusing the products are high due to the low cost.
Vice Mayor Pryor noted an 18 year-old high school senior could purchase the product.
The Communications and Legislative Affairs Director noted a high school freshman could also purchase the product if not asked for proof of identification.
Expressed support for the ordinance; discussed the use of nitrous oxide: Rachel Gratz-Lazarus, Alameda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed a League of California Cities meeting addressing the legislation; expressed concern over it being a two-year bill; stated there is a clear need and current impacts to young people; the proposed ordinance is well thought; she did not think Alameda would be the first city in the County to adopt an ordinance.
Councilmember Daysog stated Section 6-60.220 indicates penalties are not to exceed $1,000 as well as loss of business license; the penalties are stiff; he appreciates that the ordinance has teeth.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation [introduction of the ordinance].
Vice Mayor Pyror seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(26- ) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Article 3-61 (Transient Occupancy Tax) of Chapter III (Finance and Taxation) to Implement Senate Bill 346 Authorizing Cities to Require Short Term Rental Platforms to Provide Additional Information to Cities. Introduced.
The Senior Financial Analyst gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the bill was sponsored by the League of California Cities to ensure cities receive General Fund revenue; short-term rentals cause challenges; providers tend to generalize the revenues since details or accounting is not provided; platforms strongly opposed the legislation; the City endorses the matter; City staff attended presentations on the bill to gain information; expressed support for funds being placed directly into the General Fund to reduce staff time; the upcoming Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) world cup will provide team base camp for Australia’s Socceroos and will result in people staying in Alameda short-term rentals and hotels; she would like to ensure the City is positioned to capture all the revenue possible; the proposed amendment is smart, fiscally sound and should be supported.
Councilmember Jensen moved introduction of the ordinance.
Vice Mayor Pryor seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
City Manager Communications
None.
Oral Communications, Non-Agenda
None.
Council Referrals
None.
Council Communications
(26- ) Councilmember Jensen discussed attending a Waste Management Authority Energy Council and an Oakland-Alameda Access Project kickoff; stated that she gave out trophies at Corica Golf Complex tournament; announced the upcoming golf championship; stated that she attended a ribbon cutting at Leña Restaurant, the East Bay Economic Development Alliance Innovation Awards, a women’s history month event at Supervisor Tam’s office, a Chamber of Commerce Good Morning Alameda, and a Live at the Library event featuring Mads Tolling.
(26- ) Vice Mayor Pryor discussed attending the Oakland-Alameda Access Project kickoff; stated the project has been very necessary for a long time.
(26- ) Councilmember Boller discussed attending an Oakland Airport Community Noise Management Forum.
(26- ) Councilmember Daysog discussed attending two sessions of the Taste of Judaism at Temple Israel, a women’s history celebration at the Alameda Historical Museum, and a No Kings gathering.
(26- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended the women’s history month library readings, an environmental centric event put on by CivicWell, at a roundtable discussion put on by the League of California Cities regarding the Veterans Affairs Alameda Point clinic, the Spring Shindig, the Fair Housing workshop, an Alameda Science and Technology Institute event, the State of the San Francisco Bay Ferry presentation, a swearing in ceremony for Alameda Police Department, the Oakland-Alameda Access Project kickoff event, a Women in Politics event at Alameda High School, the 10th annual Youth Career and Summer Job Fair at Encinal High School, a “No Kings” rally, and a League of California Cities policy committee meeting.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:49 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
****************************************************************************************************
Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting
Wednesday- -April 29, 2026- -5:30 p.m.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 5:30 p.m.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Boller, Jensen, Pryor and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Councilmember Jensen left at 9:10 p.m.]
Absent: None.
The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(26- ) Public Employee Appointment/Hiring; Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957; Title/Description of Positions to be Filled: City Manager
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 7:31 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:42 p.m.
***
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that Council provided direction by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Boller, Pryor, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 3. Abstentions: Councilmember Daysog - 1. [Absent: Councilmember Jensen - 1.]
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 10:11 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.