Title
Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and Successor Agency to the Community Improvement Commission Meeting and the Regular City Council Meeting Held on June 18, 2024. (City Clerk)
Body
UNAPPROVED
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT COMMISSION (SACIC)
TUESDAY- -JUNE 18, 2024- -6:59 P.M.
Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:01 p.m. Vice Mayor / Commissioner Daysog led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers/Commissioners Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Jensen, and Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft - 4.
Absent: Councilmember Vella - 1.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The City Clerk announced the hearing establishing the Proposition 4 limit [paragraph no. 24- ].
Councilmember/Commissioner Herrera Spencer moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor/Commissioner Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember Vella - 1.] [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*24- CC/24- SACIC) Minutes of the Special Joint City Council and SACIC Meeting Held on May 21, 2024. Approved.
(*24- CC) Public Hearing to Consider Establishing the Proposition 4 (Appropriations) Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25; and
(*24- A CC) Resolution No. 16172, “Establishing the Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2024-25.” Adopted.
(*24- CC) Resolution No. 16173, “Approving and Adopting Midcycle Changes to the City of Alameda Budget for Fiscal Year 2024 25.” Adopted;
(*24- SACIC) Resolution No. 24-21, “Approving and Adopting Amendments to the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Budget.” Adopted; and
(*24- A CC) Resolution No. 16174, “Approving Workforce Changes and Amending the Management and Confidential Employees Association Salary Schedule in Fiscal Year 2024 25 Effective July 1, 2024.” Adopted.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, Mayor/Chair Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 7:03 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk and Secretary, SACIC
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
****************************************************************************************************
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY- -JUNE 18, 2024- -7:00 P.M.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:04 p.m.
ROLL CALL - Present: Councilmembers Daysog, Herrera Spencer, Jensen, Vella, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Councilmember Vella arrived at 7:13 p.m. and was present via teleconference from 5733 Noni Street, Kapaa, HI 96746]
Absent: None.
AGENDA CHANGES
(24- ) The City Manager announced that staff was withdrawing the voluntary sidewalk repair and enforcement program [paragraph no. 24- ].
PROCLAMATIONS, SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
(24- ) Season for Nonviolence High School Speech Contest Winner: Karishma Lopez-Renteria, Alameda Science and Technology Institute 9th Grade Student
Karishma Lopez-Renteria gave her speech.
Discussed Angel Families, immigration issues, and sanctuary cities: Brian Kennedy.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
(24- ) Brian Kennedy discussed the war in Palestine.
(24- ) Evan Gomez-Shwartz discussed proposed additions to the General Plan 2040 related to housing and how the proposals tie into Council priorities and goals.
(24- ) Ramzi Elkana discussed immigration, the start of Eid al-Adha, and the war in Palestine; urged for a ceasefire.
(24- ) Shelby Sheehan discussed the California Environmental Quality Act, Environmental Impact Reports (EIR), and significant impacts; stated the Alameda Point EIR indicates significant impacts; expressed concerns over development impacts.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The City Clerk announced the hearings for the Maintenance Assessment 01-1 District [paragraph no. 24- ] and the Landscaping and Lighting Districts 84-2 [paragraph nos. 24- and 24- ].
Vice Mayor Daysog stated that he would recuse himself from Landscape and Lighting District 84-2, Zones 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer made brief comments regarding the animal shelter agreement [paragraph no. 24- ]; inquired when the drone matter would return to Council [paragraph no. 24- ].
The City Manager responded staff will report back on the drone matter in one year.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how updates will be provided to the public.
The City Manager responded use and deployment information will be published on the website.
The Police Chief stated staff will notify of drone deployments via Significant Incident (SIG) reports; a separate report will be created before the end of the year.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the information will be posted online; noted SIG reports are only shared with Council.
The Police Chief responded staff can create a public-facing portal.
The City Attorney stated the response relates to the policy; the report will be consistent with the Council approved policy.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated there is a Council-approved policy and the policy will be used until such a time it is changed.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the public will not receive an update for an entire year of drone usage; stated there should be a dashboard for the public to receive updates in a timely manner.
The City Manager responded staff will provide basic information on the website regarding drone deployment; stated staff will not be providing footage; the information provided will likely include a tally or dashboard of drone deployments.
The Police Chief stated staff can create some form of notification to the public that records and documents drone deployments.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the approach satisfies the policy needs or whether the process needs specificity.
The City Attorney responded that he understands the policy is not being modified and staff will perform the task administratively.
The City Manager concurred with the City Attorney; stated that she understands the direction to be similar to a report-out; staff will return on an annual basis; the direction provided by Council occurred via motion, not policy; staff will provide the information.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired where and when the public will be able to obtain access to drone reports.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the inquiry from Councilmember Herrera Spencer is administrative in nature and staff can take time to respond; Council materials from the previous meeting can be reviewed to obtain correct direction.
The City Manager stated modification to the policy could jeopardize the second reading; said action is not required as part of a change; staff can provide the information and remain transparent; staff will discuss where the information will be placed on the website.
Councilmember Vella expressed support for the City Manager providing Council an update in September under City Manager Communications to clarify where the information will be contained on the website; stated once the website is up, an update and communication should be provided in a Consent Calendar report; the approach will provide staff with enough time to determine the correct details and approach for notifications.
In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer’s inquiry, Councilmember Vella stated staff needs to procure the drones which will not happen instantaneously; Council does not meet in August; stated staff will report out at the first meeting in September; there will be written communication and notice with a Consent Calendar report out; expressed concern over rushing a written communication for a July Council meeting; stated September will allow staff to provide a contemporaneous update; pursuant to the policy, staff requires training before drone deployment.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed concern over the timeframe.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she mentioned using the Police Auditor’s report to share the requested information; she does not intend to change the policy; expressed support for sharing the drone deployment information once it is ready.
The City Attorney stated the Police Auditor reports are online and publicly available for review; the Police Auditor is not reviewing every drone deployment; the Police Auditor will review drone deployments from time-to-time.
The City Manager stated the timeline proposed by Councilmember Vella is acceptable; she can report out during City Manager Communications and can also include the requested information in an upcoming Police Policy Update matter forthcoming in September.
Councilmember Vella expressed support for the upcoming report in September.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry related to the upcoming Police policy update, the City Manager stated staff regularly brings policy updates to Council on the Consent Calendar; staff will add a sentence or two to the report including the requested drone information; she will report out during Council Communications at the same meeting.
Vice Mayor Daysog moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Jensen: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
Vice Mayor Daysog left the dais.
Councilmember Vella moved adoption of the Island City Landscape and Lighting District 84-2, Zones 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8 resolution.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer: Aye; Jensen: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 4. [Absent: Vice Mayor Daysog - 1.]
(*24- ) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meeting Held on May 21, 2024. Approved.
(*24- ) Ratified bills in the amount of $2,920,873.42.
(*24- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Accela, Inc. for a Term of Three Years in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $516,833 for Continued Use of the Accela Permit System and Addition of Mobile Access for a Total Compensation Not-to-Exceed $886,887. Accepted.
(*24- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the Alameda Journal for the Publication of Legal Notices for Fiscal Year 2024-25. Accepted.
(*24- ) Recommendation to Authorize the Purchase of One Groundsmaster 4000D Lawn Mower for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $102,987.66 from Turf Star/Toro, Consistent with the Revised Vehicle Replacement Policy. Accepted.
(*24- ) Recommendation to Authorize the Purchase of One Ford F-550 for the Fire Department for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $78,163.12 from National Auto Fleet Group, Consistent with Revised Vehicle Replacement Policy. Accepted.
(*24- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a First Amendment to the Animal Shelter Operator Agreement with the Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter, increasing Compensation for Services by $186,000 for a Total Agreement Amount Not-to-Exceed $11,760,639 over the 10-Year Term, due to a Significant Increase in Animal Intakes Causing Costs for Staff and Medical Care to Increase. Accepted.
(*24- ) Resolution No. 16175, “Amending Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Alameda and the Management and Confidential Employees Association Effective June 18, 2024 to Add Four Classifications to Assigned Standby and Provide Compensation to Information Technology Personnel Required to Participate in the Department’s Standby Program to Maintain Service and Security of the City’s Information Technology Network.” Adopted.
(*24- ) Resolution No. 16176, “(a) Amending Resolution No. 9460 to Reflect Current Positions and Entities to Be Included in the City of Alameda’s Conflict of Interest Code and (b) Rescinding Resolution No. 15910.” Adopted.
(*24- ) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 16177, “Ordering the Levy of Assessments, Maintenance Assessment District 01-1 (Marina Cove).” Adopted.
(*24- ) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 16178, “Ordering that No Assessment be Levied for Fiscal Year 2024-25 in Connection with Zone 7 of the Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2.” Adopted.
(24- ) Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 16179, “Approving Ordering the Levy of Assessments, Island City Landscaping and Lighting District 84-2, Zones 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8.” Adopted.
Since Vice Mayor Daysog recused himself, the matter carried by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Herrera Spencer, Jensen, Vella and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. [Absent: Vice Mayor Daysog - 1.]
(*24- ) Ordinance No. 3372, “Adopting a Military Equipment Use Policy for Uncrewed Aerial Systems (UAS) (Drones) for the Alameda Police Department.” Finally passed.
(*24- ) Ordinance No. 3373, “Amending Alameda Municipal Code Chapter XXX (Development Regulations) to Reinstate and Update Subsection a. Exceptions for Nonconforming Lots of Section 30-5.6 Building Site, Areas and Easements, as Recommended by the Planning Board.” Finally passed.
CONTINUED AGENDA ITEMS
(24- ) Recommendation to Receive an Informational Report on Other Post-Employment Benefits.
Ira Summer, GovInvest, gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Daysog discussed percentages; stated that he recalls a discussion from 2015 related to funding and drawing down the 115 Trust; 2035 will be a critical time due to drawing down the 115 Trust; inquired whether the timeline will affect the funding projection.
Mr. Summer responded the current approach to contributions means the City will continue to pay retiree premiums until 2041 when fully funded; stated the City is putting the money into the fund to help pay for the benefits; at some point prior to 2041, Council will likely make a policy change and decide to take money out; the goal over the long-term is to set the funds aside to help pay for the benefits; generally, when the fund gets to 75% to 80%, the contributions will be treated as a pension plan; the plan would be funded more on an actuarial basis and City contributions will change; the benefit payment contributions will stop; a similar payment to the pension contributions will occur as a combination of a normal cost and be relatively small; reviewing the approach and funding policy every few years is recommended to ensure the process is on-target; if the stock market yield returns, it would be advisable to think about using the money sooner.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the matter is difficult; expressed support for the presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Councilmember Herrera Spencer; stated the presentation includes great information in an understandable format; expressed support for taking care of City staff and Council for taking past steps to adopt the 115 Trust policy; stated the approach is similar to a marathon and discipline is necessary; Council expects a lot from its staff and City staff puts a lot into the work being done; staff will not work for the City forever and will retire at some point; Council has made a promise and will keep it; she appreciates being ahead of two-thirds of other organizations.
(24- ) Recommendation to Receive an Update and Provide Direction on a Branch Library at Alameda Point.
The Library Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Vella inquired the cost estimates for staffing the facility.
The Library Director responded using the Bay Farm and West-End library models, the annual cost estimate would be roughly $400,000.
Councilmember Vella inquired the costs of updating book catalogs and other related needs.
The Library Director responded the costs are factored into the overall rough estimate; stated the price includes an opening day collection and computer system; the existing computer system can handle the increased inventory for a new location.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether the City would need to increase the overall budget for the Library outside of staffing costs and whether there would be additional costs related to upkeep of the building and facilities.
The Library Director responded in the affirmative; stated there would be additional costs for janitorial, information technology (IT) replacement, and materials; expressed concern over pulling funds from the existing budget for other branches to fund the new location.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether the impact on school-aged children has been reviewed; stated data shows that students with full-time librarians at schools tend to perform better academically and have better literacy rates; she understands staff has performed outreach with non-profits operating in the area; inquired whether staff has discussed the matter with the Alameda Unified School District (AUSD).
The Library Director responded in the negative; stated the discussions with AUSD would be forthcoming.
Councilmember Vella inquired the proposed operating hours for the branch and whether the branch would be open on weekends.
The Library Director responded the hours would be similar to the West End and Bay Farm library hours, which are open five days per week including Saturday.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how the proposed branch would work towards closing the digital divide.
The Library Director responded libraries are many things and are an opportunity to equalize; stated the library provides opportunities for people to have access to Wi-Fi, free laptops, computers, and software; the library circulates hotspots and laptops and to help bridge the digital divide for those who do not have internet at home; many people consider the internet as a utility; the cost can be expensive and is sometimes cut; the library can provide opportunity.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the additional costs in order to meet the computer needs.
The Library Director responded the initial budget estimate includes money for furniture, fixtures, and equipment; stated equipment includes computers, IT infrastructure, public computing, and any other related items.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the estimate includes costs for wireless hotspots that can be checked-out by users.
The Library Director responded the costs are not factored into the budget; stated if Council wish to add wireless hotspots, the cost would come from the existing budget.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether users will be able to borrow Chromebooks and whether the cost has been anticipated.
The Library Director responded the library recently launched a laptop lending program with Dell laptops; stated the program appears to be popular so far; many users are more comfortable with a laptop; staff is looking at laptop lending machines to create an opportunity to use the library space differently; the approach does not require the furniture related to a large desktop computer; laptops can be used wherever is desired and frees up some space.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether cell phones would be something for a library to loan.
The Library Director responded that he does know about a library cell phone program, however, he does not know many details related to the program.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether parking would be available for people who do not live in the area, to which the Library Director responded in the affirmative; stated there would be dedicated parking for the library within the development, as well as street parking.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired how many spaces will be available, to which the Library Director responded that he does not recall.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer further inquired whether the parking would include Americans with Disabilities Act parking, to which the Library Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Jensen stated the project is exciting; expressed support for the public space provided by a new branch; stated that she looks forward to seeing the space and design finalized; inquired the square footage of the West End Library.
The Library Director responded approximately 3,400 square feet; stated Bay Farm Library is about 2,700 square feet.
Vice Mayor Daysog inquired whether the branch will be on property that the City of Alameda will own or control.
The City Manager responded staff will need to look into the matter; stated the branch will be part of the development parcel; the City currently owns the property and is finalizing the details of transfer; she will need time to find out whether the City will retain the space; there are financing mechanisms, called market tax credits; there could be benefit to performing a lease-back with the non-profit; the developer might be able to use some of the new market tax credits for financing; there could be reasons to have a long term lease; staff can report back to Council; there is time to work out the details and provide information to the public and Council.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed meeting with the Library Director and a child story time event; stated the Alameda Free Library is dear to her; discussed the Library Bond Measure campaign; stated the bond funding allowed the Alameda Free Library to be built and renovated the two branches; Alameda Point has been on the list for a library branch; expressed concern over the cost estimate; stated the cost to build the Main Library amounted to around $22 million in 2005; the estimate from David Baker Architects of $4 million is concerning; expressed support for the library design being complimentary; inquired whether the vendor specializes in library design and whether the estimate was vetted; stated the estimate appears to be low.
The Library Director responded the estimate is preliminary; stated that staff did not want to get too far into the process without coming to Council for an initial direction; the estimate from David Baker is for a “warm shell” building, which is considered a habitable building; is move-in ready costs are approximately $2.7 million; the number needs to be looked into a bit more; the additional costs on top of the $2.7 million would be for furniture, fixtures, and equipment equating the $4 million estimate; as staff moves through the process, the costs will be refined; staff will return to Council with updated information and decision points on whether or not to proceed; construction costs are difficult to predict; he expects the estimate to change; David Baker and Associates are not specialists in library architecture, but are working on a project in San Francisco with a library outpost as part of the development.
Discussed the community events at the library; expressed support for the continued planning and development of the Alameda Point Library; expressed support for the tool lending program; announced an upcoming book sale: Karen Butter, Friends of the Alameda Free Library.
Discussed outreach; stated many respondents are hopeful and awe-inspired; rebuilding the community is meaningful; a library will activate the space; outlined responses: Liz Varela, Building Futures.
Expressed support for the library; stated low-income residents benefit from additional services; library services help clients become independent; read a quote from a former client: Laura Ross, Operation Dignity.
Expressed support for continued collaboration; discussed the units for development including over 300 children and youths; stated the library would be a great asset; the timing and proposed location of the proposal are ideal: Sarah McIntire, MidPen Housing.
Councilmember Jensen stated the matter is timely; discussed digital changes occurring nationwide that suggest libraries are becoming obsolete; stated that she disagrees; libraries are still important; more people are working remotely now and need a place to work; libraries provide a safe space with technology and resources; more people are also living alone; libraries offer a space to socialize; libraries offer a safe space to work, socialize, and receive input and resources; expressed support for the proposed library at Alameda Point; stated the supportive housing in the development will be served; a library will have a direct impact on residents benefitting from the resources; the library provides access to books; books are needed to help communities thrive.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated the matter sounds exciting and he looks forward to the project.
Councilmember Vella expressed support for adding a library location at Alameda Point; stated that she would like to ensure the City is adequately funding the project’s building, staffing, and operating needs; her children enjoy the programming at the Main Library; the project is important; expressed concern over underestimating the overall costs; stated libraries are important and help constituents, including AUSD; she would like the City to coordinate with AUSD regarding programming, operations, and hours; expressed support for a discussion regarding funding and ensuring available grants are being reviewed to put together within the project’s timeframe; there are many infrastructure needs at Alameda Point, including the addition of another Fire station; a number of things are needed in order to make the community great and libraries are one of them; expressed support for progress being made on the project and pro bono services; stated that she believes the initial costs will be closer to $10 to $12 million and operation costs will likely grow a substantial amount; the project is a worthwhile investment, which will make the community great; she looks forward to finding a way to set aside funds for the project and work with partners and grants.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether materials will be able to be accessed online versus hard bound books; stated the public may not be aware of the transition to online materials which do not require a trip to a physical library.
The Library Director responded in the affirmative; stated the library’s main e-book vendor is Libby; a consortium expands the reach, materials can be borrowed from Alameda Free Library and other members of the consortium; users are notified when materials are available, including audiobooks, digital magazines, and e-books; the library also uses Hoopla, which has a slightly different model from Libby; Hoopla has a daily limit due to cost and is on-demand; Libby has a waiting period and Hoopla allows for immediate use; both services are great; staff has seen a large shift towards digital materials over-time, however, books are here to stay; about 18% of usage at Alameda Free Library is digital content, which means print and physical materials are still important to the community; there is an opportunity to grow digital usage; a majority of library usage is physical materials and most of the patrons are children; children consume books at a rapid rate compared to adults; the library works to help everyone in both digital and physical formats.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for being mindful of the equity issue regarding the digital divide; stated not having a digital device denies the experience of the library’s digital content opportunities; the population hoping to be served by the Alameda Point branch will likely require more funding to meet needs for hotspots and Chromebooks; she anticipates the library will offer trainings to help patrons become more fluent in using the devices.
The Library Director concurred with Councilmember Herrera Spencer; stated there is a good opportunity for the library to partner with other available agencies to offer classes; the library can provide the space and workforce development can provide the teachers and training; access is at the heart of the library; staff will do their best to provide all Alameda libraries with the needed digital resources.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she agrees with the importance of providing children and students access to books and places to meet and socialize; some libraries offer homework help; inquired whether Alameda libraries offer homework help.
The Library Director responded that he is not aware of in-person homework help; stated the library has online tutoring available to anyone with a library card; users connect through the library website; he understands the approach does not work for those who do not have access to devices at home; staff can further look into the service.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the matter lends to the point of needing to provide devices and helping people learn to use them to provide access to homework help; students use the service, which is worthwhile; the money for the project will somehow happen and she looks forward to having another library branch.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with Councilmember Herrera Spencer’s comment regarding funding; stated that she does think the project is being under-estimated; projects always cost more than anticipated; grants and opportunities are available; expressed support for not including a kitchen in the library plan; the nearby Barn will have a commercial kitchen available for cooking demonstrations as well as the new Food Bank location; eliminating the kitchen will free up necessary project funding; discussed part of the past grant application for the Main Library agreement with AUSD; stated AUSD may not have funds to work with the library; discussed a recent book discussion group at the Main Library showing a way for community members to meet and gather; libraries are a way to level the playing field; expressed support for the Friends of the Alameda Free Library; expressed concern over under-estimating the project costs and urged other estimates be gathered; stated the funding will be found; opponents of past library projects indicated the potential lack of reading physical books, however, books still exist.
(24- ) Public Hearing to Consider Introduction of Ordinance Repealing Alameda Municipal Code Section 13-10.3, which Bans the Use of Natural Gas in New Construction and Major Remodels and Additions, In Order to Comply with California Restaurant Association v. City of Berkeley. Introduced.
In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer, the Planning, Building and Transportation gave a brief overview.
In response to Councilmember Herrera Spencer’s inquiry regarding federal preemption, the City Attorney stated the ninth circuit generally concluded that federal law regulates energy use, especially for appliances; Berkeley, and other similar ordinances, seek to modify either local health and safety laws or building codes, precluding gas connections, which was seen as a direct conflict with federal law and is therefore preempted.
Expressed disappointment with the need for repeal; stated Alameda has unique opportunities in its municipal utility with 100% clean power; urged Council to direct staff to find alternative paths for encouraging and requiring opportunities for home and property owners to convert appliances and buildings to clean power: Ruth Abbe, Community Action for a Sustainable Alameda (CASA).
Concurred with Speaker Abbe; stated the repeal makes sense; urged Council to direct staff to research how many other California cities are evaluating the policy mechanism; stated other cities have adopted a fuel-neutral ordinance requiring higher energy performance regardless of power source; discussed Seattle’s standards for large buildings: Debi Ryan, CASA and Parent Teacher Association Council.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft concurred with the public comments.
Councilmember Vella moved introduction of the ordinance with direction to staff to return to Council with alternative language for consideration.
Councilmember Vella stated the speakers covered a number of alternatives which are legally acceptable that she would like Council to discuss.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she understands staff plans to return to Council.
The City Manager stated the options raised are being included as part of the Climate Action Resiliency Plan (CARP) update; staff will return with a CARP update; expressed support for integrating the matter with the CARP process; stated staff will return to Council for feedback.
Councilmember Vella agreed the update should be included as part of the CARP update; expressed support for ensuring clarity of Council direction.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired when Council would hear the CARP update.
The Planning, Building, and Transportation Director responded staff plans to return to Council towards the end of the current calendar year.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, with support for staff’s plan to have the matter return consolidated with the CARP update.
Under discussion, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that that she understands staff has heard the comments provided by public speakers.
The City Manager stated staff will review the comments provided by public speakers.
Councilmember Jensen stated there is an upcoming meeting at the Alameda Library to discuss the CARP and Zero Waste plan; the workshop will provide an opportunity to share more ideas of how to reduce carbon and address repeal of the ordinance.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she understands federal preemption rules disallow the City to ban gas appliances; Alameda residents are savvy and understand climate change, greenhouse gas emissions, reductions, and impacts to sea-level rise; people want to make changes and buy more electric vehicles; the matter is meaningful; the California Restaurant Association brought forth the challenge to the matter; stated the City, as well as home and business owners, have a vested interest in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Jensen: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
(24- ) Resolution No. 16180, “Reauthorizing Resolution No. 16104, which Amended the Rules of Order Governing City Council Meetings Concerning the Consent Calendar, Speaking Times for the Public and Reviewing, Changing or Rescinding Prior Council Actions.” Adopted.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired the definition of routine when used regarding the Consent calendar.
The City Clerk responded routine items include annual reports, annual hearings, contracts, grants, final passage of ordinances, legislative positions, Police policies, and matters returning to Council.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired where the definition is located, to which the City Clerk responded the definition is on the website City Council meeting guide.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there is a reason the definition is not included as part of the rules.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested clarification for rules of conduct.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she means included as part of the rules of order; noted the agenda indicates the Consent calendar as “items are routine and will be enacted…” however, the definition of routine is not included.
The City Clerk responded the wording has always been in the rules; stated Council may vote to change the rules.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether a member of the public will need to go to the City website separately from looking at the agenda to find the definition of routine, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she understands the definition of routine used to be included on the agenda and is no longer.
The City Clerk stated the explanation of the section became extremely long and was confusing; staff focused on the action to be taken on the agenda to ensure clarity on the process versus the long explanation.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for including some definition so that people understand what is routine; stated the definition is broad; the current agenda has 15 items on the Consent Calendar; Councilmembers ran out of time to discuss items; expressed support for not having to pull items, however, Council should consider how many items are placed on Consent as well as speaking times for Council and the public; Council has no input on the matter; the Mayor and staff determines which items which are placed on the Consent Calendar; Council have five minutes to speak on pulled Consent Calendar items as opposed to nine minutes which creates a problem; expressed support for considering extending the speaking time when multiple items are placed on the Consent Calendar.
The City Clerk stated the approach is allowable under the rules; Council may at any point suspend the rules and vote to provide extra time; suspending the rules requires four affirmative votes.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she does not think the approach is working regarding the amount of time given to the public and Council for the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does not decide what is placed on the Consent Calendar; she meets with staff and sometimes decides the sequence of items on the regular agenda; quicker items tend to be placed towards the top.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the approach is different from when she was Mayor; a draft agenda would be presented by the City Clerk, City Manager, and City Attorney; at times, she would ask about moving items from Consent to regular and allow for more discussion time.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she is comfortable with the criteria set by the City Clerk; part of the problem was so many routine Consent Calendar items were being pulled for discussion and the regular agenda was not being heard until hours after the meeting began; the solution is workable; a supermajority of Council may approve suspending the rules; the current approach protects from a filibuster taking time from getting to other agenda items; Council agendas are a balancing act with many items needing to be covered; expecting the public staying awake until midnight or later to listen to the meeting is not transparent.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the resolution indicates having all Alamedans fully participate in Council proceedings; providing the public two to three minutes for fifteen items or more, does not allow the public to participate.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how many public comments occurred under the Consent Calendar, to which the City Clerk responded none.
Councilmember Vella inquired what other cities and agencies provide for public comment.
The City Clerk responded the approach varies; stated many other cities are not allowing any remote public comment; Alameda has always tried to make participation and public comment as simple as possible and hurdles for participation have not been created; Alameda accommodates for agenda items in-person and remotely.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether other cities have less time allowed for public comment.
The City Clerk responded in the affirmative; stated some cities cap the total amount of time allowed for comment.
Councilmember Vella inquired whether there are agencies which cap comment duration at one-minute, to which the City Clerk responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Daysog stated that he had not supported the October 3, 2023 vote implementing the current system; he will likely continue to not support the matter, largely due to the concern over sacrificing public participation on the altar of streamlining meetings; the approach does not serve the larger public goal of participation; expressed concern over having an individual speaking to all of the Consent Calendar items at once; stated that he prefers the system where members of the public can speak to each item on the Consent Calendar; the approach is not serving full public participation; he does not agree with the result of streamlining being due to filibusters; there are ways to deal with filibusters, including suspension of Council rules by a supermajority vote; he prefers the system prior to October 2023; Council should guard against sacrificing public participation on the altar of streamlining City Council meetings; a balance must be struck between the two.
Councilmember Vella concurred that a balance must be struck; stated supporting meetings that run past 11:00 at night is a point of privilege that a number of members of the public do not have, including students, working individuals, parents, and family members; Council provides a disservice to public access, transparency, and an opportunity to participate; the approach excludes vast numbers of the community when Council allows for comments and monologues from Councilmembers or members of the public to take up so much time that Council ends up pushing agenda items late into the night; Council only meets as a body twice per month for eleven months out of the year; the Charter can be changed to allow for additional meetings or changing the Council to a professional body, which would be taken up by the voters; there is more participation by individuals when the amount of speaking time is increased but the approach does not mean that more people are being heard from; many Councilmembers receive correspondence prior to meetings; there are a number of ways the public can participate; Council has a duty to engaged in the business of the people and not create forums for individuals to speak, including Councilmembers; expressed support for making the most of the time allowed in order to have productive dialogue and discussions for the matters being voted on; stated a number of bodies have a limit of one minute with many more items on Consent; many people are able to make points succinctly in the time provided; it is beneficial for Council to receive public comments ahead of time and changes can be made where needed.
Councilmember Vella moved adoption of the resolution.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: No; Herrera Spencer: No; Jensen: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 3. Noes: 2.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 9:29 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:46 p.m.
***
REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
(24- ) Recommendation to Approve the City of Alameda Americans with Disabilities Act Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.
The Public Works Director gave a Power Point presentation.
***
(24- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested a motion to extend the presentation time.
Councilmember Jensen moved approval of allowing 5 more minutes.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Jensen: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
***
The Public Works Director completed the presentation.
Councilmember Jensen stated the plan includes many projects that have been delayed or unaddressed for some time; Council approved improvements for the Veterans Memorial building; inquired what is currently being completed and what will be completed under Phase 1 of the accessibility improvements.
The Public Works Director responded work has been started at the Veterans Memorial building; stated the bathroom renovations have begun, as well as adding electric hot water heaters; design on the commercial kitchen and some refinishing on the stairs have also begun; the parking lot updates overlap with the ADA plan updates; the ADA plan identifies insufficient disabled parking; there is overlap between the two items as well as additional work which has been approved for the Veterans Memorial building; the work has begun and staff will incorporate the additional items identified in the ADA plan into the facilities plan approved by Council.
In response to Councilmember Jensen’s inquiry regarding the additional improvements, the Public Works Director stated that she does not have the list of specific additional items with her and is happy to follow up with Council.
Councilmember Jensen stated Phase 2 includes the Alameda Point Gym; inquired the ADA improvements for the Alameda Point Gym; stated there have been issues with doorways in the restrooms and overall size; questioned whether the restrooms will be addressed, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Jensen stated there are several photos of Gibbons Drive sidewalks; inquired how the improvements will fit in with the sidewalk maintenance; stated in addition to regular sidewalk maintenance, more deteriorated sidewalks often go for years without being placed on the repair schedule; sidewalks on Gibbons Drive need regular improvement due to the tree roots; inquired when the Gibbons Drive sidewalks will be addressed and whether similar areas will be addressed prior to Gibbons Drive.
The Public Works Director responded Gibbons Drive is a difficult sidewalk situation to solve; stated Council has invested the better part of $4 to $5 million dollars which does not include the additional $3 million for sidewalk projects next year; substantial work is performed when sidewalks are damaged by street trees; areas that still need attention require a decision between sidewalks and trees; Gibbons Drive will require substantial outreach and input; alternative solutions will likely be needed; solutions could be removing parking, creating bulb-outs for trees, and possible tree-removal phasing; the project is on the schedule and must be done; the funding approved in the budget will allow Public Works to begin engagement and work with a design engineer; staff has made it through main streets with the existing program; most of the work is complete; staff will review the areas again under the ADA program; many areas under the sidewalk program are separate from the ADA program and will be addressed with funding approved by Council.
Councilmember Jensen stated the ADA funding and improvements are likely to be separate from the major discussion for Gibbons Drive.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer discussed a bicycle accident; stated both of her arms are not fully functioning; expressed concern about doors at City Hall; inquired whether the doors in City Hall will be improved.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the plan has a summary table; the full report is available for each site; ADA and the Building Code require the door pressure to be no more than five pounds; the door to the City Manager’s Office should meet the required standard and, if not, the doors will be addressed.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the Permit Center has push button entry.
The Public Works Director responded that she is unsure; stated the Permit Center will either have a push button entry or the door will weigh less than five pounds; the ADA plan is focused on public amenities and did not look at each employee workspace; employee workspaces are addressed under Title 1 of the ADA plan; there is a process for reasonable accommodation; if there is an inability to open a door, there is a process where the City would provide a reasonable accommodation; one way or another, the matter will be addressed; she does not know whether the door to the City Manager’s Office is considered workspace.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the City Manager’s Office has a store for people to buy City merchandise; the public uses the area.
The Public Works Director stated that she understands the City Manager’s Office is locked and opened when needed; the door would be addressed whether identified by the ADA plan as a public amenity or as a reasonable accommodation; staff will ensure the door is no more than five pounds.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the door has had a doorbell since the pandemic; she anticipates the door will be reopened to the public at some point; the slow streets and neighborhood greenway project will possibly add speed bumps; expressed support for space between the bumps and curb for three wheeled bicycles and mobility chairs and for disabled parking spaces at City Hall; stated many times all disabled parking spaces are taken; some ADA spaces are being used for Electric Vehicles (EV) only; inquired whether a required percentage of ADA spaces must be EV only.
The Public Works Director responded the Building Code dictates a certain percentage of EV chargers to be accessible.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether there is a specific percentage for accessible and EV accessible parking and whether the EV accessible spaces are taken from the total required amount of accessible parking; stated that she has seen the scenario around town; non-EV accessible spaces are taken while the EV accessible spaces are unused; questioned whether the situation is being monitored to meet the demand of non-EV accessible vans; inquired whether the City monitors the activity.
The Public Works Director responded Parking Enforcement staff monitors ADA parking; stated that she is not aware of any public accessible EV parking.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she is speaking about private parking.
The Public Works Director stated that staff does not monitor private EV charging spaces.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether private parking lots are not required to have EV ADA spaces.
The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated City staff would not monitor private parking lots.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed concern over there not being enough non-EV ADA parking spaces; stated the City may be encouraging EV ADA spaces where most are being unused.
The Public Works Director stated the Planning, Building, and Transportation Department reviews plans for compliance with the Building Code; if the Building Code requires a specific amount of parking spaces to be EV and accessible, the plans will be reviewed accordingly; the approach is based on what the Building Code requires.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for more information being provided.
Justin Vang, Bureau Veritas, stated the Building Code counts the total number of standard parking spaces and there is an associated ratio; EV accessible charging stations are not counted as part of the total accessible spaces; the California Building Code is the minimum standard; if a certain location needs more accessible parking, additional spaces can be provided; EV charging spaces are not considered parking spaces and are meant to be a charging station under the California Building Code.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she meets with members of the Alameda Housing Authority (AHA) quarterly; one of the topics broached by the AHA relates to outreach; outreach is typically performed in many ways, such as by mail, social media, online and other methods; inquired whether there has been a meeting with AHA; stated many AHA residents will likely have disabilities.
The Public Works Director responded staff did not provide outreach to AHA; stated staff worked with the City’s Housing and Human Services division.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed support for staff considering AHA residents; stated 272 survey responses were received, which seems low; inquired whether the survey was conducted in languages other than English and, if so, which ones.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated the survey was conducted online with Google translate offering a variety of different languages; the survey offered an accommodation for anyone needing the materials provided in a different language not provided for by translation, large print, or any other format needed.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the City last conducted an ADA self-evaluation in 2008; inquired how staff will go about increasing the number of survey responses.
The Public Works Director responded the Commission on Persons with Disabilities offered feedback about developing an ADA email distribution list; staff has been using the list for the past six months; the list has over 500 subscribers.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated it is good to know there is a distribution list and a way to reach out to people during a disaster or power outage; more time to cross intersections was identified in the plan; inquired whether the adjustment can be done quickly and easily.
The Public Works Director responded in the affirmative; stated staff has completed the work at certain intersections near areas with increased elder populations; change is based on a calculation of walking speed.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed crossings in Washington DC allowing for ample time; referenced the plan’s Route Accessibility Index (RAI); inquired whether Alameda has a RAI.
The Public Works Director responded there is no single score for Alameda; stated every ten feet of sidewalk has an RAI; a machine identifies every tripping hazard and cross-slope; a measurement is taken every ten feet and an accessibility score is calculated for the segment; staff rendered the readings on a map in the plan, which resulted in many orange categories; the accessibility score is good for high-level planning; the work requires knowledge of the actual barrier.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the map appears good; expressed concern over those with color blindness not being able to properly review the map; inquired why the Shoreline Drive cycle track or the walking path along the beach were not included in the survey map.
The Public Works Director responded the report was not looking at cyclists rather, it looks at pedestrian pathways; the area has the cycle track, the sidewalk, then the asphalt path; the asphalt path falls under the responsibility of East Bay Regional Park District.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the photograph of bicyclists caused confusion.
Vice Mayor Daysog expressed support for Appendix I of the report; stated the section is very detailed and identifies specific things in each public facility that need to be addressed and the associated costs.
Stated expressed concern about speakers not being called; there is irony in the report; expressed concern over the accessibility and navigation of Council meetings: Tod Hickman.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she does not know who is providing remote public comments until they are called; inquired whether any public comments had been missed.
The City Clerk responded both attempts at public comment had been during a point where public comment was closed.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether a hard copy of the report can be made available at the library, to which the Public Works Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated the push-button bell helps at certain City Hall doors; expressed support for the bells being installed if possible.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the City of Alameda Americans with Disabilities Act Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan.
Councilmember Vella seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Jensen: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
***
(24- ) In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiries, the City Clerk responded that a motion would be need to hear the referral after 11 p.m.; stated the staff report for July 2 addressing the Charter amendment was already drafted since it goes out on Thursday, and includes an option to address the sale of property.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she would withdraw the referral.
A vote was not needed since the remaining agenda item would be called before 11:00 p.m.
***
(24- ) Recommendation to Approve Administration of a New Voluntary Sidewalk Repair and Enforcement Program and Direct Staff to Return to the City Council with Related Revision of the Alameda Municipal Code. Not heard.
(24- ) Recommendation to Approve the Conceptual Design Plan for Estuary Park Phase 2 as Modified by the Alameda Recreation and Parks Department.
The Recreation and Parks Director gave a Power Point presentation.
Councilmember Jensen expressed support for the unique aspects of the park, especially the details surrounding abled types of recreation; stated the pickleball courts will be welcomed; inquired how staff determined a dog park should be built on the site.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded during the feedback and engagement process and throughout the original planning back in 2014, the West End did not have access to a dog park; two dog parks were added at that time received grant funds and project feedback.
Councilmember Jensen noted the East End does not have a dog park; stated the West End has three even with the closure of the Main Street dog park.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated the Washington Park dog park will remain open, however, there is only the Main Street dog park on the West End; there are two dog parks near Washington Park.
Councilmember Jensen noted users of the new park will be able to bring dogs and play pickleball.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated two dog parks are being planned as part of the Clement Avenue traffic circle project; two dog parks are planned for the East End.
Vice Mayor Daysog inquired whether maintenance costs related to residential projects in the vicinity of Estuary Park Phase 2 are beyond Community Facilities Districts (CFD) project costs.
The City Manager responded if CFDs are not established within the time of City ownership, a vote is needed; it is difficult to implement a CFD after it has been subdivided and is owned by many property owners; a vote must occur to add the CFD; the process would be difficult at this point.
The City Attorney stated Council is providing direction on design plans for the park and financing actions by Council are not recommended.
Vice Mayor Daysog expressed support for the project, its groundbreaking, and the input provided by City Boards and Commissions.
Councilmember Vella stated the project has evolved substantially over time and includes a huge process to receive community feedback and create space for people to weigh in; there have been changes between the original concepts for Estuary Park versus today’s plan; the park will be meeting needs; many parks have worked with a number of different sports leagues; inquired whether partnerships and sports leagues are planned for the space.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded Phase 1 is where most of the sports activities are planned; stated Phase 2 is primarily focused on community access and use; the large lawn area is meant to be a gathering areas for families; there are casual areas to play; there has not been a lot of civic engagement for sports groups around Phase 2; staff has added pickleball courts and other items; there has been engagement and feedback from athletic groups around the lack of access to restrooms and readily available drinking fountains; Estuary Park is the only field which is open during the winter months; the facility is necessary for participation in year-round sports; staff hopes the proposed plan provides response to the requests.
Councilmember Vella stated that she has heard the sports community say the items provided make the facilities more accessible for utilization during the winter months; inquired whether there will be a process or change to the costs of the field rentals once the facilities are added.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the addition does not impact costs; stated staff addresses Recreation and Parks Department fees annually.
Councilmember Vella stated pickleball courts are well-used and busy; inquired whether a league will be renting the courts.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded staff has not currently explored renting the pickleball courts; stated the number of courts and the current demand has created an environment within the community where the access is needed now; the option can be explored; four courts have been restriped and there is one court at Lydecker Park; the trial has been going well; courts are heavily used; there is a product that can support lighting the courts through solar power which is popular with the pickleball community; expressed concern over limiting access to the courts; stated that he negotiated a potential agreement with the Hub to take all classes off of courts at Lincoln Park in order to host the classes for free; agreement details are being worked out in order to create more capacity at the other facility.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer stated that she would like the surface of the park to be as green as possible; requested clarification about the area where kids will be playing.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated that he has been researching different products; the various types of surfacing available are an engineered wood fiber broken down to a certain amount which technically meets the ADA standards, however, navigating the terrain is not easy; the City has generally provided an accessible path to many of the action and activity areas and transfer locations, primarily with a rubber surfacing that is referred to as pour-in-place; it provides a uniform, even surface with fresh plastic particles bound together through a type of glue that keeps the surface consistent; a new product is also available that uses natural cork fiber in the top half-inch surface with binding that is all-natural; the product provides an approximately similar lifespan. is completely made of cork and is a natural material; staff is determining the cost difference between the two products while working through the design process; pour-in-place is relatively expensive; the material below the half-inch surface is a regular attenuating surface that is safe for impact.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether the bike parking will be racks or lockers.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the design currently includes bike racks; stated bike racks are already available in the park picnic area; racks that support cargo bikes will also be provided; bike lockers installed at Bohol Immigrant Circle are used infrequently; he does not see bike lockers being a sought-after option for Estuary Park.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether an effort is being made to have as much shade at the park playground as possible.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded there will be trees of the appropriate species will provide more shade as they grow; stated staff will be careful with species selection.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether benches will be available around the playground.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded benches are located around the edge of planter walls along the playground.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer inquired whether people can donate benches similar to other parks.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded in the affirmative; stated there will be locations throughout Estuary Park where someone can choose to donate a bench.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for the proposed playground carousel being more accessible and safe; stated staff has presented the park well at community public meetings.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether there has been any thought about how the retention basin will fit into the park after Phase 2.
The Recreation and Parks Director responded the basin services the Bayport neighborhood as an overflow; the types of storm water are not meant to have human connections; the basin is regularly serviceable and will need to be periodically drained and dredged; the basin is dedicated as a drainage structure and will not be incorporated into the park.
Councilmember Jensen stated the Alameda Point EIR recommended a trail around the basin for viewing and potential access.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated that his discussions with the Public Works Director indicated the basin needs to be fenced off; staff can follow up on the matter.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated many people love parks; Alameda is adding to its park inventory; expressed support for cargo bike racks; stated children never have to be told how to use a park; there are many options for play; discussed playing bocce ball at Lincoln Park in one area with pickleball and basketball being played nearby; stated that she is marveled at how parks allow for wonderful gathering spaces; expressed support for the pickleball courts not being close to homes.
The Recreation and Parks Director stated staff focused activities on the more industrial side of the park along Mitchell Avenue to keep separation as far as possible.
Councilmember Herrera Spencer moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by the following roll call vote: Councilmembers Daysog: Aye; Herrera Spencer: Aye; Jensen: Aye; Vella: Aye; and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft: Aye. Ayes: 5.
CITY MANAGER COMMUNICATIONS
(24- ) The City Manager announced an upcoming Starlight Movie in the Park, a workshop for the Climate Action and Resilience and Zero Waste, and an e-bike safety webinar.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS, NON-AGENDA
None.
COUNCIL REFERRALS
(24- ) Consider Directing Staff to Prepare a Charter Amendment Measure for the November 5, 2024 Ballot to Amend Section 3-10 Pertaining to Sale of Property and Leases. (Councilmember Jensen) Withdrawn.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS
(24- ) Councilmember Jensen outlined the City Council Code of Conduct; stated that she signed the Code of Conduct without hesitation due to feeling strongly about government functioning best when individuals communicate honestly, openly, and with respect; those that have served with her over the years have never questioned her honesty, integrity, or impartiality until the Council discussion May 21st regarding a park naming; Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft suggested that she [Councilmember Jensen] had received a contribution and/or maintained a personal relationship which had influenced her [Councilmember Jensen’s] decision; stated the Mayor called into question her [Councilmember Jensen’s] impartiality and integrity, and insinuated that members of the public had improperly influenced a Council decision; she would like to ensure that every decision she makes as a Councilmember is in the best interests of Alameda; that she has never taken a bribe, nor has she made a decision to advance her personal interests; in all of her positions, from Federal Regulator, to Senior Advocate, School Board Director, and City Councilmember, she has maintained the highest standards of fairness, impartiality, and honesty; she trusts that the Mayor will avoid using her office to disrespect her [Councilmember Jensen’s] motives in the future; she, and citizens, deserve better.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated that she would follow up with Councilmember Jensen offline.
(24- ) Vice Mayor Daysog announced that he attended the commemoration of Women’s Veterans Day sponsored by the Alameda County Veterans Affairs Commission at the Alameda Naval Air Museum (ANAM); stated Chair Omar Farmer and Diane Williamson were specially recognized.
(24- ) Councilmember Herrera Spencer expressed support for Councilmember Jensen; discussed recent crimes; announced that she attended the Women’s Veterans recognition day at ANAM and the grand opening of the Hub; discussed participation in the NextGen subcommittee for the Airport Noise Forum, and attending both of the aquatic design meetings at the O’Club; stated that she and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft attended the Alameda Women Leaders event where Councilmember Jensen gave a presentation.
(24- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed attending the Change of Command ceremony at the Coast Guard Base Alameda, presenting a wooden model of the Park Street bridge and speaking at a League of Women Voters student advisory committee housing forum and at a leadership program graduation; announced the Grand Marshals for the 4th of July parade: Barabara Lee and Joe LoParo.
(24- ) Mayor's Nominations to Various Boards and Commissions.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Selia Warren for appointment to the Civil Service Board; Allison Mullings for reappointment to the Commission on Persons with Disabilities; Clifford Tong for reappointment to the Golf Commission; Michaelea Joseph-Brown, Vadim Sidelnikov and Kenji Tamaoki for reappointment to the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners; and Sunny Tsou for reappointment to the Planning Board.
ADJOURNMENT
(24- ) There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:25 p.m. in memory of Willie Mays.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.