Title
Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on October 20, 2026. (City Clerk)
Body
UNAPPROVED
Minutes of the Special City Council Meeting
Tuesday- -October 20, 2026- -6:00 p.m.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 6:01 p.m.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Boller, Daysog, Jensen, Pryor and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Councilmember Daysog arrived at 6:15 p.m. and Councilmember Jensen arrived at 6:31 p.m.]
Absent: None.
The meeting was adjourned to Closed Session to consider:
(26- ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); Case Name: James Green v. City of Alameda; Court: Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB); Case No: ADJ21962783
(26- ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation; Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a); Case Name: Christopher Marks v. City of Alameda; Court: Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB); Case Nos: ADJ21768243; ADJ19298977; ADJ19298974; ADJ11296022
(26- ) Conference with Legal Counsel - Potential Litigation; Potential Initiation of Litigation Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, Subsection (d)(4); Number of Cases: One (As Plaintiff - City Initiating Legal Action); Potential Defendant: Astra Space, Inc.
Following the Closed Session, the meeting was reconvened and the City Clerk announced that regarding Green v. City of Alameda, this case involves a worker’s compensation claim filed by James Green, a former employee of the Alameda Police Department; the Council authorized the Acting City Attorney to settle Mr. Green’s claim by global compromise and release by unanimous voice vote - 4 [Absent: Councilmember Jensen - 1]; regarding Marks v. City of Alameda, this case involves four workers’ compensation claims filed by Christoper Marks, a former Fire Division Chief of the Alameda Fire Department, who served approximately 27 years with the City; the Council authorized the Acting City Attorney to settle Mr. Marks’ claims by global compromise and release by unanimous voice vote - 3 [Absent: Councilmembers Daysog and Jensen - 2]; and regarding Potential Litigation, staff provided information and Council provided direction by unanimous voice vote - 5.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 6:59 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.
****************************************************************************************************
Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting
Tuesday- -October 20, 2026- -7:00 p.m.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft convened the meeting at 7:12 p.m. Vice Mayor Pryor led the Pledge of Allegiance.
Roll Call - Present: Councilmembers Boller, Daysog, Jensen, Pryor, and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 5. [Note: Councilmember Jensen left the meeting at 10:40 p.m.]
Absent: None.
Agenda Changes
(26- ) The City Clerk announced the Social Service Human Relations Work Plan [paragraph no. 26- ] with withdrawn and would not be heard.
Proclamations, Special Orders of the Day and Announcements
(26- ) The City Clerk announced ways voters can submit ballots and showed a slide with a phone number to contact to report election concerns.
Oral Communications, Non-Agenda
(26- ) Geoffrey Burnaford, Alameda, discussed the importance of Measure L in upcoming election; urged Council to create and execute a plan to prevent further damage to the Island.
(26- ) William Morrison, Keep Gibbons Open, stated City administration should create new procedures to better administer public input; efforts for traffic calming on Fernside Boulevard are unnecessary.
(26- ) Charles Liuson, Leydecker Park Pickleball, discussed the sense of community and benefits pickleball brings to Alameda residents; stated he was surprised the pickleball courts may be rented out; expressed hope for an amiable agreement.
(26- ) Dashiel Moreno, Alameda, outlined the possible downsides for students at Encinal High School if an AI data center is built.
(26- ) Michael Swartz, Alameda, expressed objection to having AI data centers in Alameda.
(26- ) Amos White, Alameda, presented a petition objecting to the construction of AI data centers; discussed Alameda residents’ concern with the construction of AI data centers; stated nearby cities chose not to move forward due to residents’ concerns.
(26- ) Katya Murthy, Alameda, stated transparency for closed sessions is essential; expressed concern over construction of AI data centers.
Consent Calendar
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that the Social Service Human Relations Board work plan [paragraph no. 26- ] was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft outlined the benefits and the importance of Proposition 1 [paragraph no 26- ]; urged residents to vote yes; and expressed opposition to Proposition 43 [paragraph no 26- ] due to the limits it would impose on voting.
Councilmember Boller moved approval of the Consent Calendar.
Vice Mayor Pryor seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5. [Items so enacted or adopted are indicated by an asterisk preceding the paragraph number.]
(*26- ) Minutes of the Special and Regular City Council Meetings Held on September 15, 2026. Approved.
(*26- ) Ratified bills in the amount of $4,397,809.66.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Five-Year Agreement with Maverick Networks Inc. for (1) Telephone Hardware and Implementation Services and (2) a Cloud-Based (Zoom) Unified Communications Telephone System for a Total Compensation Not to Exceed $569,618. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Two-Year Service Provider Agreement with Ninyo & Moore Geotechnical & Environmental Sciences Consultants in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $393,980, for Geotechnical, Environmental, and Construction Testing Services for the Alameda Aquatic Center. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Three-Year Agreement in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $75,000 with the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office for the Use of the Alameda County Sheriff’s Office Regional Training Center. Accepted.
(26- ) Recommendation to Accept the Social Service Human Relations Board Work Plan for Fiscal Year 2026-27. Not heard.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize Continued Action to Address Declaration of Unsafe Building and Notice to Vacate, Case Number VB26-0009 for the City-Owned Building Located at Building 78, 2301 Sunrise Court, Alameda, California. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Second Amendment to the Agreement with Terraphase Engineering Inc. for Environmental Support Services for the Clement Avenue / Tilden Way Project, Extending the Term by One-Year and Increasing the Not-to-Exceed Amount by $102,800, for a Total Contract Amount Not-To-Exceed $607,800. Accepted.
(*26- ) Recommendation to: (i) Authorize the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with Chrisp Company for the Lincoln Avenue/Marshall Way/Pacific Avenue Advanced Striping Project, P.W. No. 07-26-03, for a Not-to-Exceed Amount of $405,476, including Contingency; (ii) Approve Project Plans and Specifications; (iii) Delegate Authority to the City Engineer or Designee to Approve Issued Amendments and Addenda to the Project Plans and Specifications, and to Authorize Field Changes Through the Change Order Process; and (iv) Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Project Funding Agreement with Alameda County Transportation Commission for a Transportation Fund for Clean Air Grant. Accepted; and
(*26- A) Resolution No. 16465, “Amending the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Budget (Fund 310) to Appropriate $149,000 in TFCA Grant funds to Capital Improvement Project C65700 (Lincoln Avenue/Marshall Way/Pacific Avenue Advanced Striping Project).” Adopted.
(*26- ) Resolution No. 16466, “Adoption of Resolution Amending Fiscal Year 2026-27 Non-Departmental General Fund Budget to Appropriate $125,000 and Transfer Appropriations from Vacancy Savings for Consulting Services of $125,000 for Recruiting Consulting Services.” Adopted; and
(*26- A) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute Six, Two-Year Service Provider Agreements in an Amount Not-To-Exceed $250,000 Each to the Hawkins Company, Cooperative Personnel Services (dba CPS HR Consulting), Muchmore Than Consulting, Teri Black & Co., Ralph Andersen & Associates, and WBCP Inc., for Executive and Management Level Recruitments. Accepted.
(*26- ) Resolution No. 16467, “Approving Amendment No. 1 to the Transmission Agency of Northern California Project Agreement No. 3 and Authorizing the Alameda Municipal Power General Manager to Execute the Amendment.” Adopted.
(*26- ) Resolution No. 16468, “Supporting Proposition 1, “Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2026,” on the November 3, 2026, California Statewide Ballot.” Adopted.
(*26- ) Resolution No. 16469, “Opposing Proposition 43, “Limit Voters’ Ability to Raise Revenues for Local Government Services, Legislative Constitutional Amendment,” on the November 3, 2026, California Statewide Ballot.” Adopted.
(*26- ) Ordinance No. 3415, “Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease with Longshot Space Technologies Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, for a Term of Thirty-Seven Months for a Portion of Building 29 known as Suite 200, Located at 1701 Monarch Street, at Alameda Point.” Finally passed.
Continued Agenda Items
None.
Regular Agenda Items
(26- ) Recommendation to Receive a Report on the Alameda Museum.
The Library Director made brief comments.
Valerie Turpin, Alameda Museum, gave a Power Point presentation.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed gratitude to all the volunteers; inquired whether the museum is 75 years old, to which Ms. Turpin responded in the affirmative.
Vice Mayor Pryor expressed appreciation for the Alameda Museum staff and the collaboration with the community.
Councilmember Jensen inquired what the repatriation process is for the indigenous artifacts.
Kent Anderson, Alameda Museum, responded the process is led by an established group; stated Alameda Museum works with tribal groups and allows them to take lead in the process; noted the Museum is simply a steward of the artifacts.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the repatriation removes the artifacts, to which Mr. Anderson responded the Museum is holding the artifacts until the Confederated Villages of Lisjan (CVL) are ready to accept them.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the CVL is the only group interested in the artifacts.
Mr. Anderson stated the CVL responded to inquiries and engaged with the Museum; stated this procedure is used by most Museums.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she wanted to ensure other organizations had the opportunity to work with CVL and review the materials.
Mr. Andersen stated the Museum reached out to as many groups as possible; the Museum’s mission is to provide access and communication; assured this has been a community process.
Councilmember Jensen inquired about partnership and activities with the Naval Air Museum.
Mr. Andersen stated all the Museums in Alameda have had the intention to bind together and work as a collective.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry about Mr. Andersen’s background working at other Museum’s around California, Mr. Andersen shared his experience with non-profit organizations in Napa and Sacramento; expressed he is excited to enhance quality and educational opportunities in Alameda.
In response to Councilmember Jensen’s inquiry about collaboration, Ms. Turpin stated most of the Museum’s collaboration is sharing archives.
Councilmember Daysog expressed appreciation to the Museum for widening education of Alameda history.
Councilmember Jensen moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote -5.
(26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager or Designee to Install Safety and Active Transportation Improvements at Pacific Avenue and Wilma Chan Way, which Includes a Prohibition of Through Traffic Along Pacific Avenue and All Left Turns in the Intersection.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired about the concerns the community members presented.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator stated most of the concerns are technical questions about the design; outlined the three main issues the community presented; discussed how the City will monitor the effects of the design and possible solutions to the three issues presented.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether the turn prohibition is only for traffic going north, to which the Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the negative; stated it is for both.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether turns are allowed from Wilma Chan Way onto Pacific Avenue, to which the Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the negative; stated all left turns will be prohibited in the intersection.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether Pacific Avenue will be only right turns from either entry, to which the Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether she could turn left on Buena Vista Avenue or Lincoln Avenue if she were driving northbound from the Posey Tube, to which the Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative; stated Buena Vista Avenue would be best.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether Alameda is a part of the pilot program with red light running cameras on an intersection with Wilma Chan Way.
The City Engineer responded the camera program is for no right turns on red; stated the red-light camera is on Atlantic Ave and Webster Street.
The Transportation Planning Manager stated the program is not in place yet.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the residents west of Pacific Avenue have expressed concerns.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded there was no direct feedback from residents regarding the driving experience; stated most feedback was involving the pedestrian experience.
Councilmember Daysog inquired about the Grocery Outlet’s perspective.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded the Grocery Outlet Manager was positive about safety improvements at the intersection; outlined Grocery Outlet’s drivers’ route on Buena Vista Avenue; stated Grocery Outlet provided detailed feedback that could be implemented in the plan.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether the new traffic light would be on Pacific Avenue and Wilma Chan Way.
The Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative; stated it would be a resting green light; Public Works will monitor traffic to adjust light timing as needed.
Councilmember Daysog inquired whether a button must be pressed to initiate the traffic light, to which the Senior Transportation Coordinator responded in the affirmative; stated pedestrians will press the button, and bicyclists will have passive detection.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the center aligned bikeway is raised or painted, to which the Senior Transportation Coordinator responded the issue will be discussed and depend on the operational needs of the Fire Department.
Expressed appreciation for the implementation of new safety measures; expressed objection to the traffic light on far side of intersection: Michele MacIver, Alameda.
Expressed support for the changes brought by this project; discussed the need for constant focus on pedestrian safety: Zac Bowling, Alameda.
Councilmember Boller outlined the City’s commitment to having no pedestrian injuries; stated this project is a great step to improve safety.
Councilmember Daysog discussed personal experiences with accidents at the intersection; stated the pedestrian walk button would be an incredible addition; he agrees with Ms. MacIver and believes the button would be better at the south-side light.
The City Engineer stated there will be crosswalks both north and south of Pacific Avenue; there will be signal poles for pedestrians on both sides as well.
Vice Mayor Pryor expressed gratitude for enacting this change.
Councilmember Jensen stated this will dramatically improve safety; staff should remain alert of drivers who will not stop at intersection.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft outlined the role of traffic enforcement in response to Councilmember Jensen’s concerns; expressed excitement over this project and the progress Alameda has made; noted the project is well designed.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Boller seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
(26- ) Introduction of Ordinance Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Lease with Poseidon Tech Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, for a Term of Seven Years, with Two Additional Five-Year Extension Options for Building 11, Located at 1190 West Tower Avenue, at Alameda Point. Introduced;
(26- A) Resolution No. 16470, “Appropriating $828,905 from the Fund 290 (Alameda Point) Fund Balance to Cover the Cost of Broker Commission.” Adopted; and
(26- B) Resolution No. 16471, “Declaring Building 11, Located at 1190 West Tower Avenue, and Adjacent Land Area Totaling Approximately 130,000 Square Feet to be Exempt Surplus Land for the Purpose of Leasing Under the California Surplus Land Act.” Adopted.
The Base Reuse Manager gave a Power Point presentation.
***
(26- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft suggested allowing five more minutes for the presentation.
Vice Mayor Pryor moved approval of allowing five more minutes.
Councilmember Boller seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
***
The Base Reuse Manager completed the presentation.
Councilmember Boller stated the report did not provide sufficient information on all the upgrades; inquired what the technological manufacturing process consists of and what would be the environmental impacts of the business.
In response to Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft’s inquiry, Councilmember Boller clarified upgrades may be more involved than detailed in the report.
The Base Reuse Manager responded Poseidon will adhere to the tenant upgrades in the work letter.
In response to Councilmember Boller’s inquiry, David Zagaynov, Poseidon, stated the manufacturing process combines aerospace techniques with traditional boat building techniques; the planes decrease the environmental impact by using unleaded fuel and burning less fuel.
Councilmember Jensen inquired how the brokerage fees are structured.
The Base Reuse Manager stated the brokerage fees are market rate and based on commission fees; outlined the brokerage commission agreement with Jones Lang Lasalle (JLL).
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether all brokerage fees are an upfront payment, to which the Base Reuse Manager responded in the affirmative; noted the security deposit was set at a higher amount as a safety net.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether Poseidon currently has a an agreement in place to occupy the building.
The Base Reuse manager responded Poseidon is under an administrative licensing agreement; stated the license was executed after consulting City Council in a Closed Session meeting.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there are advantages for starting with a licensing agreement before a lease agreement.
The Base Reuse Manager responded licensing agreements allow the City to compete with private landlords which have a quicker process than City lease agreements.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how soon the lease would go into effect if the ordinance is approved, to which the Base Reuse Manager responded December 3rd.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the transaction would look different in the private market, to which the Base Reuse Manager responded it is significantly longer for the City; stated the process is about 6 months.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the turn-around time is relevant in negotiations, to which the Base Reuse Manager responded in the affirmative; stated start-ups with venture capital are eager to begin.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the public is aware of licensing agreements and if they are competitive.
The Base Reuse Manager responded many companies use a licensing agreement, specifically with short term projects; stated most properties are marketed for lease agreement; Building 11 was actively being marketed when Poseidon approached the City.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she understands the usage of licensing agreements but would like more transparency.
The City Manager stated the goal is always transparency; bringing agreements to Closed Sessions promotes transparency; emphasized licensing agreements allow the City to compete with the private market.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the agreement was considered in Closed Session, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Daysog whether the assignment clause of the lease agreement protects the City from the tenant switching with another tenant, to which the Acting City Attorney responded in the affirmative; stated the language in the clause was recently tightened to address this issue.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is a timeframe for when the roof would need to be replaced.
The Base Reuse Manager stated the roof has exceeded its lifespan; Poseidon has agreed to do necessary patchwork; she cannot provide an exact number of months or years.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the focus should not only be on the revenue but also on the possible costs; inquired whether Poseidon would be interested in buying the building if the City decides to sell it.
The Director of Base Reuse and Economic Development responded in the negative; stated Poseidon is interested in growing its business, not real estate.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed concern about Poseidon losing the space if the building were sold.
The Director of Base Reuse and Economic stated Poseidon would be protected by the lease agreement; lease agreements are favorable to potential buyers due to providing stable revenue.
Outlined his experience, the purpose of creating Poseidon, and the benefits of Poseidon’s aircrafts; expressed excitement to work at Alameda Point; discussed how working in Alameda will benefit Poseidon and the City: David Zagaynov, Poseidon Aerospace.
Expressed strong support for Poseidon’s lease; stated the lease would be an investment in Alameda’s economic future; urged Council approval: Madlen Saddik, Chamber of Commerce.
Councilmember Boller expressed excitement for the future with Poseidon; discussed the benefits of Poseidon providing new jobs and improvements to the building; expressed excitement over Alameda being at the forefront of innovation.
Councilmember Daysog expressed excitement over the prospect of Poseidon leasing in Alameda and appreciation a lease that ensures Poseidon will remain the only occupant of the lease.
Vice Mayor Pryor expressed excitement over positive environmental impact Poseidon is pursuing.
Councilmember Jensen welcomed Poseidon to Alameda.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed excitement that Poseidon is coming to Alameda; stated Alameda is a great place to grow a business; expressed admiration for Poseidon’s quick meeting with the Transportation Management Agency to provide employees with transit passes.
Vice Mayor Pryor moved approval of the staff recommendation [introduction of the ordinance and adoption of the resolutions].
Councilmember Boller seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
***
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft called a recess at 9:25 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 9:41 p.m.
***
(26- ) Introduction of Ordinance Amending the Alameda Municipal Code by Amending Section 2-59.3 (Authorization of Contracts) of Chapter II (Administration) to Increase the City Manager, City Attorney, and City Clerk’s Contract Authorization Authority. Introduced; and
(26- A) Recommendation to Reaffirm and Adopt a Revised City of Alameda Purchasing Policy Consistent with the Amendment to the Ordinance.
The Senior Financial Analyst gave a Power Point presentation.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether there is a timeframe for when the policy should be reevaluated.
The Senior Financial Analyst responded there should be routine checkups; outlined using the Consumer Price Index (CPI) as an escalator and recent exponential CPI growth.
The City Manager discussed consistent review of procedures and policies; expressed the desire to stay current and be as efficient as possible.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what the reporting mechanism is for contracts the City Manager has approved, to which the City Manager responded there is no reporting requirement; stated if Council expresses curiosity he can provide reports.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether the $150,000 to purchase goods and services is needed for the City Clerk and City Attorney.
The City Clerk responded it would only be necessary if the entire Council Chambers broadcast system needed replacing.
The Acting City Attorney stated the City Attorney’s office would only reach the $150,000 threshold when contracting outside council regarding litigation; Council would remain informed throughout litigation.
Councilmember Daysog stated that he would prefer the threshold to be at $100,000.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft stated the range seems appropriate; expressed trust in staff; stated that she supports the increase since it will help staff perform more efficiently.
Councilmember Jensen moved approval of the staff recommendation [including introduction of the ordinance].
Vice Mayor Pryor seconded the motion, which carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Boller, Jensen, Pryor and Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft - 4. Noes: Councilmember Daysog - 1.
Consent Calendar - Items Removed for Discussion
(26- ) Recommendation to Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Service Provider Agreement with Harris & Associates to Complete an Economic Development Strategic Plan in an Amount Not-to-Exceed $250,000.
The Economic Development Division Manager made brief comments.
Councilmember Daysog expressed support for the plan; inquired how the Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) is approaching the growth of microbusinesses.
In response to Councilmember Daysog inquiry, the Economic Development Division Manager outlined the three components of the EDSP; stated research will be conducted to determine what sectors to focus on; the community engagement process will provide insight into how to work with new and existing small business; stated that he is familiar with economic gardening to help small business grow.
Councilmember Jensen inquired how the research will help develop policies and how controversial organizations will fit into Alameda.
The Economic Development Division Manager responded the feedback will be collected from businesses and community members prior to the development of the EDSP; stated a community outreach initiative for AI data centers has already begun.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether the EDSP will include these aspects of the community outreach.
The Economic Development Division Manager responded that the plan would identify which sectors to focus on based on community needs and input.
Councilmember Jensen expressed her desire to ensure the organizations not wanted in Alameda are delineated; inquired whether Council will receive further reports once the EDSP is developed, to which the City Manager responded in the affirmative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted Council’s position is that ICE detention centers will not be tolerated in Alameda.
Councilmember Daysog stated the community is extremely concerned about AI data centers joining Alameda.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of the staff recommendation.
Councilmember Jensen seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous voice vote - 5.
City Manager Communications
(26- ) The City Manager stated the Emergency Operation Center (EOC) has been partially activated; outlined work Public Works is conducting to prepare the City and resources available to residents.
The Public Works Director outlined different steps residents can take to prepare their homes for possible storms.
Oral Communications, Non-Agenda
None.
Council Referrals
(26- ) Consider Directing Staff to Develop a Policy for Public Notice and Council Review of Agreements for Rent or Lease of City-Owned Property for a Period of Greater than One Week. (Councilmember Jensen)
Councilmember Jensen made brief comments.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired what problem Councilmember Jensen is attempting to address.
Councilmember Jensen stated the issue is some buildings at Alameda Point are being used without input from Council or the community.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether there is misuse that Councilmember Jensen has identified, to which Councilmember Jensen responded in the negative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft noted real estate contracts are negotiated in Closed Session meetings for several reasons; stated Council hires staff capable of making decisions; inquired what is Councilmember Jensen exact intention.
Councilmember Jensen responded agreements were not brought to Council; stated the public should be informed about licensing agreements.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft requested the Base Reuse and Economic Development Director provide an overview of licensing agreements.
The Base Reuse and Economic Development Director stated licensing agreements are for businesses that require temporary use; noted licenses can be terminated at City’s disposal.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired whether licenses keep the City from leasing or selling buildings, to which the Base Reuse and Economic Development Director responded in the negative.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether Poseidon is under a licensing agreement, to which the Base Reuse and Economic Development Director responded in the affirmative.
Councilmember Jensen inquired why there is a licensing agreement with Poseidon, if their intentions are not temporary.
The Base Reuse and Economic Development Director responded a licensing agreement was issued to allow Poseidon into the building quicker; outlined the lease agreement approval process; stated upon consulting with Council, the licensing agreement was issued to remain competitive with the private sector.
Councilmember Jensen inquired whether it would be burdensome to inform Council when the City enters a licensing agreement.
The City Manager responded his goal with the Council is to overcommunicate; stated many licensing agreements were completed during a transitional period; implementing more bureaucracy will require additional staff and resources.
Councilmember Jensen stated that she would like licensing agreements to be disclosed to the public.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired how the City Manger would report licensing agreements.
The City Manager responded quarterly or bi-annual reports can be presented to Council.
Councilmember Daysog outlined the differences between a license and lease agreement; stated there are safeguards in place to ensure license agreements cannot become leases.
The Acting City Attorney affirmed Councilmember Daysog’s statement.
Councilmember Boller stated the current process is a balance of trade-offs; expressed trust in the City Manager’s office.
Councilmember Boller moved approval of providing Councilmember Jensen with 2 additional minutes.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed that she did not want to entertain the motion.
(26- ) Consider Providing Direction to Staff Regarding: 1) Designating the Contiguous Mature Canopy of American Sweetgum Trees Lining Gibbons Drive as a Protected Tree Corridor and Historic Cultural Landscape, and 2) Drafting an Ordinance Amending Alameda Municipal Code Section 13-21.7(c) to Establish a Permanent Regulatory Framework. (Councilmember Daysog)
Councilmember Jensen recused herself and left the meeting.
Councilmember Daysog made brief comments.
In response to Vice Mayor Pryor’s inquiry about the role of the Historical Advisory Board (HAB) in infrastructure plans, the Public Works Director outlined the tree removal policy and protected tree ordinance; stated a community engagement process is conducted before creating a draft plan; staff plans to present an item to the HAB in the near future.
Stated Gibbons Drive should be considered a Protected Tree Corridor; discussed the positive impact the trees have had on Alameda residents: Pam Luo, Alameda.
Expressed gratitude to Councilmember Daysog for representing the community on this issue; stated the trees are an ecological wonder and are a non-negotiable for Alameda: Lorraine Perry, Alameda.
Expressed support for the referral; stated protecting the trees should be top priority: John Perry, Alameda.
Urged Council to support the referral; discussed the background and importance of the trees; stated the trees preserve the historic character in Alameda: Lorre Zuppan, Alameda.
Urged Council to support the referral; discussed the historical importance of the trees and community feedback regarding removal of the trees: Peter Aston, Alameda.
Inquired why the City is considering cutting down the trees; stated the trees are Alameda history and should be designated a historic landscape: Aileen Dubois, Alameda.
Discussed the trees historical value; urged Council to support the referral: Marlene, Alameda.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether the referral is necessary if the HAB will already be reviewing the infrastructure plan.
The City Manager responded Councilmember Daysog’s referral is specifically looking for a historical designation for the trees; stated the HAB will meet and provide input for Council to make an informed decision.
Councilmember Daysog stated the proposed ordinance will require HAB input on a case-by-case basis.
The City Manager discussed different perspectives provided by the HAB, Planning Board and Commission on Persons with Disabilities; stated all perspectives will be presented to Council.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft inquired when the item would be presented to the Council.
The City Manager responded the HAB would hear it November 5, 2026 and the target is December for Council.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether removing 20% of trees every five years is the target.
The Public Works Director responded in the negative; stated 20% is a safe cap against complete canopy loss; the tree removal process would be location based; outlined solutions will be considered before tree removal and the difference in the process if the trees become protected.
Councilmember Boller inquired whether the HAB will review the plan regardless of the approval of the referral.
The City Manager responded in the affirmative; stated the Council will hear the HAB’s perspective; despite historical preservation, trees still need to be evaluated; the proposal will add weeks to the already robust tree removal process.
Councilmember Daysog stated the role of Council is to set policy on tree removal; discussed the decision-making power belonging to the Council.
Councilmember Daysog moved approval of direction staff to come back to City Council as soon as possible with regard to modifying Alameda Municipal Code Section 13-21.7.c in the matter presented in the referral.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft discussed removal not pertaining to all trees and the importance of the perspectives provided by advisory boards; inquired whether a motion is required.
The Acting City Attorney responded in the negative; stated direction could be given without a motion.
The City Manager stated the conversation can continue at the December 1st meeting; the final decision belongs to Council.
Councilmember Boller inquired whether it is additional burden for staff to draft an ordinance, to which the Acting City Attorney responded in the negative.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft expressed her opposition to an ordinance.
Vice Mayor Pryor expressed her hesitancy to vote without all the information; noted the perspectives from the advisory boards is missing; stated that she will not make an uninformed decision.
Councilmember Boller stated his focus is on the feasibility of having a potential draft ordinance.
Councilmember Boller made a substitute motion to approve providing direction to staff to include a potential draft ordinance when the matter returns to Council.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether the ordinance could be introduced by Council at the meeting.
Councilmember Boller responded it would be included in the staff reports.
The Acting City Attorney stated the draft ordinance would include the contents of Councilmember Daysog’s proposal with additional staff feedback.
Councilmember Boller inquired whether the draft ordinance would bind staff to a recommendation.
The Acting City Attorney responded multiple ordinances may be provided to give Council alternatives.
Vice Mayor Pryor inquired whether the ordinance would have any conflict with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The Acting City Attorney responded ADA compliance will be evaluated closely when drafting the ordinance.
Councilmember Daysog seconded the substitute motion.
Under discussion, the City Clerk stated the motion is approval of direction to the City Attorney to draft a potential ordinance, including the potential ADA impact.
On the call for the question, the motion carried by unanimous voice vote - 4. [Absent: Councilmember Jensen - 1.]
Council Communications
(26- ) Councilmember Daysog announced that he attended Pride in the Park, and a memorial service for Christopher Buckley, James Smallman and Judith Lynch from the preservation community.
(26- ) Councilmember Boller announced that he attended Walk and Roll to School Day, an economic forecast event, Pride in the Park, Board and Commission Appreciation Reception and the Friends of the Alameda Animal Shelter fundraiser.
(26- ) Vice Mayor Pryor announced that she attended the Boards and Commission appreciation reception.
(26- ) Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft announced that she attended Walk and Roll to School Day, the AC Transit Liaison Committee meeting, the Economic Forecast event, Pride in the Park, an Edison Elementary School book reading, a groundbreaking for East Bay Greenway, the Alameda County Mayors Conference at the Alameda Food Bank, the emergency preparedness fair and the No Kings rally.
(26- ) Mayor’s Nominations for Appointments to the Commission on Persons with Disabilities, Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, and Social Service Human Relations Board.
Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft nominated Zac Bowling for appointment to the Housing Authority Board of Commissioners.
Adjournment
There being no further business, Mayor Ezzy Ashcraft adjourned the meeting at 11:34 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lara Weisiger, City Clerk
The agenda for this meeting was posted in accordance with the Sunshine Ordinance.