Skip to main content

File #: 2022-2333   
Type: Minutes
Body: Historical Advisory Board
On agenda: 9/1/2022
Title: Historical Advisory Board Draft Meeting Minutes - June 2, 2022
Title

Historical Advisory Board Draft Meeting Minutes - June 2, 2022

Body

DRAFT MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF ALAMEDA HISTORICAL ADVISORY BOARD
THURSDAY, JUNE 2, 2022

1. CONVENE
Chair Thomas Saxby called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm.

Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, codified at Government Code Section 54953, Historical Advisory Board members can attend the meeting via teleconference.

2. ROLL CALL
Present: Chair Saxby, Board Members Lau, Sanchez, and Wit.
Absent: Vice President Lynn Jones.

3. MINUTES
None.

4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION
None.

5. ORAL COMMUNICATION
Mike Van Dine discussed the Freedom of Information request for the texts between Mayor Ashcraft, Allen Tai, Andrew Thomas and Doug Biggs regarding the project on McKay Ave.

6. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None.

7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
7-A 2022-2083
Public Workshop to Review and Comment on the April 2022 Draft Housing Element

Allen Tai, City Planner, introduced this item and gave a brief presentation. The staff report and attachments can be found at https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=5662275&GUID=AFB12801-625B-4FB1-9C2A-BD15DABF6F2F&FullText=1

Chair Saxby opened the board clarifying questions on the Transit Overlay District.

Chair Saxby asked for clarification on what information would benefit the staff.

Staff Member Tai discussed what staff was looking for in this workshop.

Board Member Norman Sanchez asked for clarification on the Transit Map.

Staff Member Tai discussed and gave explanation on the Transit Map.

Heather Coleman, the consultant, also provided information and clarification on the Transit Map.

Chair Saxby asked how the Transit Overlay district would be effected by the Design Review process. He also wanted to know why the 1000sq ft. was chosen.

Staff Member Tai said it would go through the same Design Review process. He then discussed requirements for the district. He answered that the 1000sq ft. was considered large...

Click here for full text