File #: 2015-1247   
Type: Regular Agenda Item
Body: City Council
On agenda: 2/17/2015
Title: Adoption of Resolution Declaring the City's Intention to Revise the Sewer Service Charge and Establish Procedures for Accepting Protests Pursuant to Article XIID, Section 6(a) of the California Constitution Regarding Property-Related Fees and Charges. (Public Works 602)
Attachments: 1. Exhibit 1 - Sewer Rate Study, 2. Exhibit 2 - Guidelines for the Sumbission and Tabulation of Protests, 3. Presentation, 4. Resolution - Intention to Revise Sewer Service Charge
Title

Adoption of Resolution Declaring the City's Intention to Revise the Sewer Service Charge and Establish Procedures for Accepting Protests Pursuant to Article XIID, Section 6(a) of the California Constitution Regarding Property-Related Fees and Charges. (Public Works 602)

Body
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: John Russo, City Manager
Recommendation to Adopt a Resolution Declaring the City's Intention to Revise the Sewer Service Charge and Establish Procedures for Accepting Protests Pursuant to Article XIID, Section 6(a) of the California Constitution Regarding Property-Related Fees and Charges

BACKGROUND

The City of Alameda (City) collects sewage generated by Alameda residents and businesses and conveys it via a network of sewer pipes, pump stations, and lift stations to the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) for treatment. Many of the City's sewers were installed in the early to mid-20th century and now show signs of deterioration such as loose joints, cracks, and breaks. The City, by design, has separate sanitary sewer and storm water drainage systems. Infiltration and inflow (I/I) is stormwater that should enter the storm drainage system but instead enters the sewer system through these cracks and other defects in the sewer pipes. I/I causes excessive sanitary flows during wet weather events that exceed both local conveyance and regional treatment capacity.

In the 1980s, EBMUD constructed three wet weather facilities (WWFs), with regulatory approval, to handle the increased sanitary flow during large storm events. However, in 2007, EBMUD's discharge permit for the WWFs was remanded by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ruling that the discharges do not meet secondary treatment standards and therefore, are in violation of the Clean Water Act.
In 2009, the EPA filed a complaint against EBMUD for the continued use of the WWFs. The EBM...

Click here for full text