File #: 2016-2507   
Type: Regular Agenda Item
Body: City Council
On agenda: 2/2/2016
Title: Recommend Approval of the AC Transit Service Expansion Plan's Buena Vista Avenue/Line 19 Alternative. (Public Works 310)
Attachments: 1. Exhibit 1 - Transportation Commission Memo, 2. Exhibit 2 - AC Transit Service Extension Plan Letter, 3. Exhibit 3 - Service Extention Plan Comments, 4. Presentation, 5. Presentation - REVISED, 6. External Correspondence

Title

 

Recommend Approval of the AC Transit Service Expansion Plan’s Buena Vista Avenue/Line 19 Alternative. (Public Works 310)

 

Body

 

To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

 

From: Elizabeth D. Warmerdam, Interim City Manager

 

Re: Recommend Approval of the AC Transit Service Expansion Plan’s Buena Vista Avenue/Line 19 Alternative

 

BACKGROUND

The Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) developed a district-wide Service Expansion Plan (SEP) amounting to $25.4 million annually.  The SEP aims to improve the existing service network by trying to better meet demand and by providing frequent and reliable service to the densest residential and commercial neighborhoods.  City staff attended AC Transit’s October community meeting in Alameda and incorporated comments from community members who attended the meeting.  At the November 3, 2015 City Council meeting, the City Manager communicated to the Council staff’s intent to send a letter to AC Transit consistent with community comments and Vice Mayor Matarrese and Councilmember Daysog’s input at the AC Transit Inter-Liaison Committee meetings discussed below. 

At the November 11, 2015 public hearings, the AC Transit Board received additional oral and written comments from community members.  The outreach effort for the public hearings exceeded the minimum requirements of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and AC Transit Board policy.  Staff received and discussed SEP comments from the Transportation Commission’s (TC) Transit Committee, which includes Commissioners Miley, Bertken and Schatmeier (Exhibit 1).  Staff requested and reviewed the electronic SEP outreach comments received by AC Transit on Alameda routes (Exhibit 3). 

Staff presented and discussed its SEP recommendation at the Interagency Liaison Committee between AC Transit and City of Alameda representatives on October 14, 2015 and January 6, 2016, which included Mayor Spencer and Councilmember Daysog in October and Vice Mayor Matarrese and Councilmember Daysog in January.  At the January 6, 2016 Inter-Liaison Committee between the City of Alameda and AC Transit, AC Transit extended the deadline for the City of Alameda from January 13, 2016 to March 1, 2016 to provide time for the TC and the City Council to specifically select a recommended expansion route alternative.

At the January 13, 2016 AC Transit Board meeting, the AC Transit Board voted to proceed with the SEP except for City of Alameda alternatives as shown below:

 

 

                     Postpone the Alternatives Recommendation (SEP Alternatives #1, 2 and 3):

Allows Alameda time to obtain TC and City Council approvals on a recommended alternative.  AC Transit only has funding to implement one of the following three new bus routes in the City of Alameda (Figures 1-3):

o                     Alternative #1: Shoreline area (Main Street Ferry - Fruitvale BART)

o                     Alternative #2: Encinal Avenue (Main Street Ferry - Fruitvale BART)

o                     Alternative #3: Buena Vista Avenue / Restore Line 19 (Downtown Oakland - Fruitvale BART)

The figures below show the listed route alternatives in green:

 

Figure 1: Alternative #1 - Shoreline (Main Street Ferry - Fruitvale BART)

 

                     

 

 

 

 

 

 

                     Figure 2: Alternative #2 - Encinal (Main Street Ferry - Fruitvale BART)

Figure 3: Alternative #3 - Buena Vista (Downtown Oakland - Fruitvale BART)

 

Other items in the SEP include:

Maintain Existing Line O: Based on comments received from the public and City of Alameda staff, the AC Transit Board did not proceed with the T1 proposal, and will maintain the Line O in its existing condition, which terminates at the Fruitvale BART station and travels along Santa Clara Avenue (Figure 4).  Though there are merits to the proposal to have the route terminate on the Alameda side of the estuary and to travel along Encinal Avenue, the impacts of this change include breaking the connection from the east end of the island to the Fruitvale BART station and moving the route off of Santa Clara Avenue, which is the central crosstown spine for Alameda.

 

Figure 4: T1 - Encinal (Broadway & Blanding - San Francisco)

 

                     Modify Line 31 (L28 14th Avenue): Provides new direct service between the College of Alameda and Laney College/Lake Merritt BART station after traveling through downtown Oakland (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Modified Line 31 (L28 14th Avenue)

 

The next steps involve the TC and City Council approving one of the three alternatives on January 27, 2016 and February 2, 2016, respectively.  The AC Transit Board will be requested to approve the recommended alternative in spring 2016.  Implementation of the additional bus service will occur either in summer 2016 or December 2016.

 

DISCUSSION

 

AC Transit has requested that the City of Alameda select one of the three alternatives as shown in Table 1 as the recommended additional bus service to be provided as part of AC Transit’s SEP since AC Transit only has funding to implement one alternative.  Even though all three alternatives are important, City staff and the TC’s Transit Committee recommend restoring AC Transit Line 19 (SEP Alternative #3), which would serve the Northern Waterfront Priority Development Area (PDA), as the highest priority for the City of Alameda.  Alternative #3 (Buena Vista Avenue/Restored Line 19) has more potential to relieve congestion than the other two alternatives.  A restored Line 19 along the Northern Waterfront would serve Fruitvale BART and downtown Oakland, which would provide both BART and AC Transit connections to locations throughout the San Francisco Bay Area.  The TC’s Transit Committee recommendation is shown in Exhibit 1, and the City staff recommendation is summarized in a draft letter to AC Transit in Exhibit 2.  City staff also requests that AC Transit consider altering the proposed route to include Marina Village, increasing the service frequency to every 20 minutes during peak hours, and sharing bus stops in Oakland with Line 51A to allow riders to have multiple options to Alameda. 

With several new transit-oriented residential developments under construction in the Northern Waterfront PDA, it is important to restore Line 19 as soon as possible.  An opportunity exists to pursue a partnership between AC Transit, the City of Alameda and the Northern Waterfront PDA developments whereby the developments would provide operating funds for the line to increase frequency to 20-minutes during the peak commute periods and access to AC Transit EasyPasses, which are group discount transit passes.  A partnership would benefit AC Transit and the future Northern Waterfront transit users, and would provide a better transit alternative than multiple independent development-sponsored shuttles running services parallel to a restored Line 19.  The 20-minute frequencies during peak commute periods are important to mitigate project-related traffic during these more congested times of day.  Additionally, this Northern Waterfront partnership also could encompass the existing Estuary Crossing Shuttle services, ridership and funding, and would benefit existing Northern Waterfront residents who tend to be lower income than other Alameda residents.

City staff requests that AC Transit continue to commit staff resources to plan a cross island connection to the Main Street ferry terminal (SEP Alternatives #1 and #2) in partnership with the City and the Water Emergency Transportation Authority (WETA).  The City, WETA and AC Transit need to identify potential revenue sources, a cross island route based on community consensus and cost-efficient ways to implement the service as soon as possible. 

Table 1: Alternatives Comparison

 

Alt #1 (Ferry-Shoreline)

Alt #2 (Ferry - Encinal)

Alt #3 (Line 19 - Buena Vista)

Frequency

30 minute

30 minute

30 minute

Span

6 a.m. to 10 p.m.

6 a.m. to 10 p.m.

6 a.m. to 10 p.m.

 

Activity Centers

Alameda Landing, Webster St, South Shore Center

Park Street

Webster Street, Park Street, Marina Village

 

Major Transit Hubs

Main St. Ferry, Fruitvale BART

Main St. Ferry, Fruitvale BART

12th Street BART, Fruitvale BART

 

Low Income/Density Served

West Alameda, Shoreline multi-family units

West Alameda

West Alameda, Northern Waterfront

 

Past Service

Segments similar to Line 63

Segments similar to Line 63

Line 19

 

Impact to Tube Traffic

Reduces San Francisco commuters

Reduces San Francisco commuters

Reduces San Francisco, Oakland and Berkeley commuters

 

Schools Served

College of Alameda, ASTI, Wood Middle School

Encinal High School, Junior Jets, Alameda High School

College of Alameda, College of Alameda Annex, Argosy University

 

Potential Financial Partnership Opportunity

Alameda Landing, WETA

WETA

Northern Waterfront, Marina Village

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPACT

 

There is no impact to the General Fund.  The transit operations are funded by AC Transit.  The City of Alameda will pay for the costs of restoring the bus stops and making them accessible.  This expense could be paid for using Measure B or BB - Alameda County's transportation sales tax.

 

MUNICIPAL CODE/POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE

 

General Plan Transportation Element policies support transportation design solutions that improve safety and balance the needs of all modes of transportation, including pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and automobile facilities.  In 2001, the City Council adopted a Transit First Policy to increase the use of transit.  This action does not affect the Municipal Code.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

AC Transit is the lead agency, and concluded that the SEP would have no significant impact on the environment, as set forth in a Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration.  The AC Transit Board approved the Initial Study/Negative Declaration on January 13, 2016.

RECOMMENDATION

The City staff recommendation addresses input from the City Council, TC and the community at large, and recommends City Council approval of the AC Transit SEP’s Buena Vista Avenue/Line 19 alternative as stated in the staff letter to AC Transit (Exhibit 2) and summarized as follows:

                     Restore AC Transit Line 19 (SEP Alternative #3), which would serve the Northern Waterfront PDA, as the highest priority for the City of Alameda. 

                     Continue the partnership with AC Transit and WETA to provide a new cross island service to the Main Street Ferry Terminal (SEP Alternatives #1 or #2) by identifying potential revenue sources, routing preferences based on community consensus and cost-efficient ways to implement the service as soon as possible.

 

Respectfully submitted,

Gail Payne, Transportation Coordinator

 

Financial Impact section reviewed,

Elena Adair, Finance Director

 

Exhibits:

1.                     Transportation Commission’s Transit Committee Memo

2:                     City of Alameda Draft Letter to AC Transit

3:                     Compilation of Comments Received by AC Transit for the City of Alameda Bus Lines in the SEP