Title
Public Hearing to Establish the Proposition 4 (Appropriations) Limit for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17 and Adoption of Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for FY 2016-17. (Finance 2410)
Body
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Jill Keimach, City Manager
Re: Public Hearing to Establish the Proposition 4 (Appropriations) Limit for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016-17 and Adopt of Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for FY 2016-17
BACKGROUND
In November 1979, the voters of the State of California approved Proposition 4. The proposition created Article XIIIB of the State Constitution placing limits on the amount of revenue that can be spent by state and local governments in California. Each government entity is required to set its Appropriation Limit each fiscal year with FY 1978-79 serving as the base year limit. Limit adjustments occur each subsequent year using a combination of increases in population and in per capita personal income (CPI), whichever is less.
Proposition 4 and its implementing legislation were modified by Proposition 111. Beginning with the Fiscal Year 1990-91 Appropriation Limit, the annual adjustment factors changed. On an annual basis, the government entity can select whichever is greater: the CPI or assessed valuation due to non-residential construction within the City. To determine the population factor, the entity can select the greater of population growth either within the City or County.
Proceeds of taxes in excess of the limit, with limited exceptions, must be returned to the taxpayers within two years by refund or reduction in tax rates, unless an extension of the limit is approved by majority popular vote.
DISCUSSION
A resolution must be adopted to approve an annual appropriations limit each fiscal year. This action is required under Section 7910 of the Government Code and by Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (commonly referred to as the "Gann Limitations"). The appropriations limit sets a cap on the amount of proceeds that can be received by the City from certain types of taxes.
Annual adjustments for per capita income and population may be made in either of two ways. Per capita income may be adjusted by the change in the State’s per capita personal income or by the percentage change in the local assessment roll from the preceding year, resulting from the addition of new non-residential construction in the City. Population may be adjusted by the change in the City’s population or by that of the entire County.
To adjust per capita income for FY 2016-17, staff recommends using the change in the California State per capita personal income of 5.37% instead of the increase in the City’s assessed value for FY 2016-17 due to changes in non-residential new construction. The City’s non-residential new construction as a percentage of the total taxable value for FY 2016-17 increased 4.22% over the preceding year. In addition, staff recommends using the percentage growth of the City population, which was 1.98%, as it exceeded the County’s population growth of 1.06%.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact from the adoption of the City’s appropriations limit. For FY 2016-17, the City will continue to maintain a comfortable margin between the appropriations limit and net proceeds of taxes. The FY 2016-17 appropriations limit is established at $111,848,988, as compared to the net proceeds of specific taxes for FY 2016-17, which is estimated to be $64,263,762, which is approximately 57% of the limit.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This activity is not a project and is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to section 15378 (b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it involves governmental fiscal activities (acceptance of the appropriations limit), which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment.
MUNICIPAL CODE/POLICY DOCUMENT CROSS REFERENCE
This action does not affect the Alameda Municipal Code.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution establishing the appropriations limit for FY 2016-17.
Respectfully submitted,
Elena Adair, Finance Director
Exhibit:
1. Appropriations Limit Calculation for Fiscal Year 2016-17