File #: 2018-5197   
Type: Regular Agenda Item
Body: Planning Board
On agenda: 2/12/2018
Title: Revisions to Approved Design for Block 8 at Alameda Point
Attachments: 1. Exhibit 1 Design Changes
Title

Revisions to Approved Design for Block 8 at Alameda Point

Body

CITY OF ALAMEDA
Memorandum

To: Honorable President and Members of the Planning Board
From: Andrew Thomas, Assistant Community Development Director
Date: February 12, 2018
Re: Building Permit Revisions for Affordable Housing Project on Block 8 at Alameda Point
In 2017, the Planning Board approved the Design Review plans for "Block 8" at Alameda Point consistent with the Site A Development Plan approved in 2015. Block 8 includes 130 deed restricted affordable housing unit for seniors and families to be developed and managed by Eden Housing. Since the approvals for Site A in 2015 and the Design Review approvals for Block 8 in 2017, several issues have arisen.
Construction costs in the Bay Area have increased between 30 and 40% since 2015. Unlike prior economic booms, short supply of labor is the main driver of these cost increases and the small pool of union signatory general contractors and sub-contractors available in the Bay Area. Due to these cost problems, the development of Site A by Alameda Point Partners has been delayed. The construction delays have begun to put some of the affordable housing funding secured for Block 8 by Eden Housing at risk. Some of the secured funding for Block 8 requires commencement of construction by January 2019. To commence construction in 2019, Eden Housing must invest significant resources in building construction plans immediately.
The Tax Reform Bill that went into effect January 1, 2018 reduced the corporate tax rate to 21%. This reduction has had a dramatic impact on Low Income Housing Tax Credit pricing. The Low Income Housing Tax Credit is the main source of financing for affordable housing projects in California, and throughout much of the nation. As a result of the corporate tax rate cut, the tax credit is much less valuable to corporations, which reduces value of the credits to the project.
For thes...

Click here for full text