File #: 2019-6890   
Type: Minutes
Body: Planning Board
On agenda: 5/13/2019
Title: Draft Meeting Minutes - April 22, 2019
Title

Draft Meeting Minutes - April 22, 2019


Body

DRAFT MINUTES
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD
MONDAY, APRIL 22, 2019

1. CONVENE
President Sullivan convened the meeting at 7:00 p.m.

2. FLAG SALUTE
Board Member Rothenberg led the flag salute.

3. ROLL CALL
Present: President Sullivan, Board Members Cavanaugh, Curtis, Rothenberg, Saheba, Teague.
Absent: Mitchell.

4. AGENDA CHANGES AND DISCUSSION
*None*

5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
*None*

6. CONSENT CALENDAR
6-A 2019-6801
Annual Review: Alameda Point Site A Development Agreement - Applicant: Alameda Point Partners, LLC (APP). Approve a Resolution Finding that APP has Demonstrated Good Faith Compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the Alameda Point Site A Development Agreement from April 15, 2018 through April 15, 2019, based on the Findings contained in the Draft Resolution. This Compliance Review is not a project under CEQA
Board Member Teague pulled the item from the Consent Calendar in order to allow the staff update and board discussion.

Staff Member Thomas said the item was continued from the previous meeting to add some information about a pending application to amend the development agreement. The staff report and attachments can be found at: https://alameda.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3917147&GUID=D7327310-F3C6-4117-98F2-85261E2A01A2&Options=&Search=&FullText=1

Board Member Curtis asked if the 80 units being requested by developer exceeds the original amount included in their development agreement.

Staff Member Thomas said that the 80 units are in addition to the 800 units in the original development agreement. He said approving the annual review does not prejudice a future Planning Board decision on the pending application.

President Sullivan asked how the additional requested units impact the 1,425 unit cap for Alameda Point.

Staff Member Thomas said the 1,425 units have already been allocated, which means the request for 80 additional units would require ...

Click here for full text